vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EnerSys (ENS) and Essex Property Trust (ESS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EnerSys is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($919.1M vs $479.6M, roughly 1.9× Essex Property Trust). Essex Property Trust runs the higher net margin — 17.9% vs 9.8%, a 8.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Essex Property Trust posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.5% vs 1.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Essex Property Trust's revenue compounded faster (6.0% CAGR vs 0.5%).
EnerSys is a stored energy systems and technology provider for industrial applications. The company manufactures reserve-power and motive-power batteries, battery chargers, power equipment, battery accessories and outdoor equipment enclosures.
Essex Property Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust that invests in apartments in California and in the Seattle metropolitan area.
ENS vs ESS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $919.1M | $479.6M |
| Net Profit | $90.4M | $85.7M |
| Gross Margin | 30.1% | 70.0% |
| Operating Margin | 13.5% | 31.7% |
| Net Margin | 9.8% | 17.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.4% | 5.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.3% | -71.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.40 | $1.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $919.1M | $479.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $951.3M | $473.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $893.0M | $469.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $974.8M | $464.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $906.2M | $454.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $883.7M | $450.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $852.9M | $442.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $910.7M | $426.9M |
| Q4 25 | $90.4M | $85.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $68.4M | $172.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.5M | $231.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.5M | $212.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $114.8M | $301.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.3M | $125.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.1M | $99.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $60.9M | $285.1M |
| Q4 25 | 30.1% | 70.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.1% | 69.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.4% | 70.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.2% | 69.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.9% | 70.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.5% | 69.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.9% | 70.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.9% | 69.7% |
| Q4 25 | 13.5% | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 44.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.7% | 59.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.5% | 55.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.7% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 28.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | 31.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.9% | 31.0% |
| Q4 25 | 9.8% | 17.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 49.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.9% | 45.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.7% | 66.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | 27.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.2% | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.7% | 66.8% |
| Q4 25 | $2.40 | $1.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.80 | $2.56 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.46 | $3.44 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.39 | $3.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.88 | $4.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.01 | $1.84 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.71 | $1.45 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.48 | $4.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $450.1M | $76.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | $5.5B |
| Total Assets | $4.0B | $13.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $450.1M | $76.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $388.6M | $66.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $346.7M | $58.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $343.1M | $98.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $463.2M | $66.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $407.9M | $71.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $344.1M | $55.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $333.3M | $499.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $802.0M | $6.6B |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $5.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $5.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $5.5B |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $13.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $13.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $13.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $13.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $12.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $12.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $12.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | $12.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.57× | 1.22× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.46× | 1.19× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $184.6M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $171.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.04× | 12.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $441.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $184.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.0M | $342.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $968.0K | $216.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $135.2M | $281.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.6M | $316.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.4M | $218.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $314.9M |
| Q4 25 | $171.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $197.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-32.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $104.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.04× | 12.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.19× | 1.98× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.02× | 0.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.40× | 1.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.71× | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.41× | 2.52× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.15× | 2.21× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ENS
| Energy Systems | $399.5M | 43% |
| Motive Power | $352.0M | 38% |
| Services | $92.6M | 10% |
| Transferred Over Time | $38.2M | 4% |
| Other | $36.8M | 4% |
ESS
Segment breakdown not available.
