vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EnerSys (ENS) and Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $919.1M, roughly 1.2× EnerSys). EnerSys runs the higher net margin — 9.8% vs 3.5%, a 6.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.0% vs 1.4%). EnerSys produced more free cash flow last quarter ($171.3M vs $45.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (1.5% CAGR vs 0.5%).
EnerSys is a stored energy systems and technology provider for industrial applications. The company manufactures reserve-power and motive-power batteries, battery chargers, power equipment, battery accessories and outdoor equipment enclosures.
Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc., branded as Floor & Decor, is a multi-channel American specialty retailer of hard surface flooring and related accessories that was founded in 2000 and headquartered in Smyrna, Georgia, United States.
ENS vs FND — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $919.1M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $90.4M | $39.3M |
| Gross Margin | 30.1% | 43.5% |
| Operating Margin | 13.5% | 4.6% |
| Net Margin | 9.8% | 3.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.4% | 2.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.3% | -17.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.40 | $0.36 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $919.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $951.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $893.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $974.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $906.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $883.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $852.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $910.7M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $90.4M | $39.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $68.4M | $57.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.5M | $63.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.5M | $48.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $114.8M | $47.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.3M | $51.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.1M | $56.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $60.9M | $50.0M |
| Q4 25 | 30.1% | 43.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.1% | 43.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.4% | 43.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.2% | 43.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.9% | 43.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.5% | 43.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.9% | 43.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.9% | 42.8% |
| Q4 25 | 13.5% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.7% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.5% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.7% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.9% | 5.4% |
| Q4 25 | 9.8% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.9% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.7% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.2% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.7% | 4.6% |
| Q4 25 | $2.40 | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.80 | $0.53 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.46 | $0.58 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.39 | $0.45 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.88 | $0.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.01 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.71 | $0.52 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.48 | $0.46 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $450.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | $2.4B |
| Total Assets | $4.0B | $5.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $450.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $388.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $346.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $343.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $463.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $407.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $344.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $333.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $802.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $5.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $4.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | $4.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.46× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $184.6M | $124.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $171.3M | $45.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.6% | 4.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 7.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.04× | 3.15× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $441.3M | $64.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $184.6M | $124.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.0M | $102.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $968.0K | $84.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $135.2M | $71.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.1M | $101.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.6M | $160.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.4M | $194.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $147.5M |
| Q4 25 | $171.3M | $45.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $197.1M | $24.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-32.1M | $-10.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $104.9M | $4.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.8M | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $36.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.7M | $80.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $35.8M |
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.6% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.8% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.0% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.7% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.2% |
| Q4 25 | 2.04× | 3.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.19× | 1.79× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.02× | 1.33× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.40× | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.71× | 2.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.41× | 3.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.15× | 3.42× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.95× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ENS
| Energy Systems | $399.5M | 43% |
| Motive Power | $352.0M | 38% |
| Services | $92.6M | 10% |
| Transferred Over Time | $38.2M | 4% |
| Other | $36.8M | 4% |
FND
| Laminate And Vinyl | $310.1M | 27% |
| Tile | $259.1M | 23% |
| Installation Materials And Tools | $218.4M | 19% |
| Decorative Accessories And Wall Tile | $177.0M | 16% |
| Wood | $83.2M | 7% |
| Natural Stone | $46.8M | 4% |
| Adjacent Categories | $26.6M | 2% |
| Other | $8.5M | 1% |
