vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EnerSys (ENS) and SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc (SSNC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6B vs $919.1M, roughly 1.8× EnerSys). SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc runs the higher net margin — 13.7% vs 9.8%, a 3.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.8% vs 1.4%). Over the past eight quarters, SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc's revenue compounded faster (6.5% CAGR vs 0.5%).
EnerSys is a stored energy systems and technology provider for industrial applications. The company manufactures reserve-power and motive-power batteries, battery chargers, power equipment, battery accessories and outdoor equipment enclosures.
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. is an American multinational holding company headquartered in Windsor, Connecticut, that sells software and software as a service to the financial services industry. The company has offices in the Americas, Europe, Asia, Africa and Australia.
ENS vs SSNC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $919.1M | $1.6B |
| Net Profit | $90.4M | $226.1M |
| Gross Margin | 30.1% | 48.7% |
| Operating Margin | 13.5% | 24.2% |
| Net Margin | 9.8% | 13.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.4% | 8.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.3% | 6.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.40 | $0.91 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $919.1M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $951.3M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $893.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $974.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $906.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $883.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $852.9M | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $226.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $90.4M | $193.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $68.4M | $210.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.5M | $180.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.5M | $213.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $114.8M | $248.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.3M | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.1M | $190.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 48.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.1% | 47.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.1% | 47.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.4% | 48.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.2% | 49.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.9% | 49.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.5% | 48.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.9% | 48.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.5% | 22.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.7% | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.5% | 23.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.7% | 23.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 22.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | 22.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.8% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.9% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.7% | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.2% | 13.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.91 | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.40 | $0.76 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.80 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.46 | $0.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.39 | $0.84 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.88 | $0.98 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.01 | $0.65 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.71 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $450.1M | $420.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $7.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | $6.9B |
| Total Assets | $4.0B | $20.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.08× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $420.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $450.1M | $462.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $388.6M | $388.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $346.7M | $480.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $343.1M | $515.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $463.2M | $567.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $407.9M | $694.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $344.1M | $462.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $6.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $6.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $20.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $20.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $19.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $19.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $20.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $19.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $16.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.08× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $184.6M | $299.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $171.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.04× | 1.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $441.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $299.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $184.6M | $643.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.0M | $456.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $968.0K | $372.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $135.2M | $272.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.1M | $486.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.6M | $336.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.4M | $384.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $171.3M | $633.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $197.1M | $421.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-32.1M | $350.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $104.9M | $259.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.8M | $466.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $310.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.7M | $374.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | 38.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.6% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.8% | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.3% | 30.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.0% | 25.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.7% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.04× | 3.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.19× | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.02× | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.40× | 1.28× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.71× | 1.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.41× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.15× | 2.02× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ENS
| Energy Systems | $399.5M | 43% |
| Motive Power | $352.0M | 38% |
| Services | $92.6M | 10% |
| Transferred Over Time | $38.2M | 4% |
| Other | $36.8M | 4% |
SSNC
| Technology-enabled services | $1.4B | 85% |
| License, maintenance and related | $239.8M | 15% |
