vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ENTEGRIS INC (ENTG) and Gen Digital (GEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gen Digital is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $823.9M, roughly 1.5× ENTEGRIS INC). Gen Digital runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs 6.0%, a 9.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gen Digital posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.5% vs -3.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Gen Digital's revenue compounded faster (13.2% CAGR vs 3.4%).
Entegris, Inc. is a supplier of materials for the semiconductor and other high-tech industries. Entegris has approximately 8,000 employees throughout its global operations. It has manufacturing, customer service and/or research facilities in the United States, Canada, China, Germany, Israel, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan. The company’s corporate headquarters are in Billerica, Massachusetts.
Gen Digital Inc. is a multinational software company co-headquartered in both Tempe, Arizona (USA) and Prague, Czech Republic (EU). The company provides cybersecurity software, financial technology, and services. Gen is a Fortune 500 company and a member of the S&P 500 stock-market index. It is listed at both NASDAQ and Prague Stock Exchange. Its portfolio includes Norton, Avast, LifeLock, Avira, AVG, ReputationDefender, MoneyLion and CCleaner.
ENTG vs GEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $823.9M | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $49.4M | $192.0M |
| Gross Margin | 43.8% | 78.4% |
| Operating Margin | 12.7% | 34.9% |
| Net Margin | 6.0% | 15.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.1% | 28.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -51.7% | 6.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | $0.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $823.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $807.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $792.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $773.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $849.8M | $986.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $807.7M | $974.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $812.7M | $965.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $192.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $49.4M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $70.5M | $135.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.9M | $142.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.2M | $159.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.6M | $161.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $67.7M | $181.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 78.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.8% | 78.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.5% | 78.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.1% | 80.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.6% | 80.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.0% | 80.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.2% | 80.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.7% | 35.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | 35.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.8% | 41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.6% | 37.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.9% | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.0% | 43.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.0% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.7% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.1% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.0% | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | 18.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.31 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.33 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.35 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.41 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.67 | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.51 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.45 | $0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $360.4M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.7B | $8.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $8.4B | $15.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.94× | 3.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $360.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $399.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $376.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $340.9M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $329.2M | $883.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $432.1M | $737.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $320.0M | $644.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $8.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1B | $8.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $15.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.4B | $16.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.4B | $16.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.4B | $15.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.4B | $15.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5B | $15.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.3B | $15.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.61× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.94× | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.99× | 3.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.06× | 3.64× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.08× | 3.94× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.15× | 4.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.18× | 4.33× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $192.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $134.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.89× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $396.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $192.0M | $541.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $249.5M | $409.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $113.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $140.4M | $473.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $176.1M | $326.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $197.2M | $158.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $111.2M | $264.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $134.0M | $535.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.8M | $405.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.4M | $470.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.6M | $318.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.0M | $156.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.9M | $262.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | 43.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.6% | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.2% | 46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.1% | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.2% | 16.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.4% | 27.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.3% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.7% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.3% | 0.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.89× | 4.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.54× | 3.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.15× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.23× | 3.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.72× | 2.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.54× | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.64× | 1.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ENTG
| Fabs | $516.3M | 63% |
| Equipment And Engineering | $121.8M | 15% |
| Chemical And Materials | $83.8M | 10% |
| Other | $61.7M | 7% |
| Non Semi | $40.3M | 5% |
GEN
| Cyber Safety Platform | $819.0M | 66% |
| Trust Based Solutions | $421.0M | 34% |
| Net Interest Income On Notes Receivable | $4.0M | 0% |