vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. (EOSE) and Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. (PLYM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($58.0M vs $51.2M, roughly 1.1× Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc.). Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -106.3% vs -207.7%, a 101.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (699.6% vs -1.4%).
Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. is an energy storage solutions provider that designs, produces and deploys safe long-duration zinc-based battery systems. It serves utility, commercial, industrial and microgrid customers across North America, Europe and Asia, supporting grid stability and renewable energy integration.
Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. is a real estate investment trust focused on owning, operating, and acquiring high-quality industrial properties including distribution centers, warehouses, and light industrial facilities across key U.S. logistics hubs. It serves tenants in e-commerce, retail, manufacturing, and third-party logistics sectors, supporting diverse business supply chain needs.
EOSE vs PLYM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $58.0M | $51.2M |
| Net Profit | $-120.5M | $-54.4M |
| Gross Margin | -93.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | -140.1% | -102.5% |
| Net Margin | -207.7% | -106.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 699.6% | -1.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 55.1% | -248.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.53 | $-1.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $58.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.5M | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2M | $47.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5M | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.3M | $47.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $51.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $48.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $50.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-120.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-641.4M | $-54.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-222.9M | $-6.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.1M | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-268.1M | $147.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.2M |
| Q4 25 | -93.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -111.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -203.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -234.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -324.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -140.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -200.6% | -102.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -419.1% | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -506.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -712.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -29.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -207.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2102.1% | -106.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1463.2% | -12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 144.7% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3696.7% | 309.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -30.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.53 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.91 | $-1.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.05 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.30 | $3.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $568.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $813.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-2.2B | $470.1M |
| Total Assets | $885.2M | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $568.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $58.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $120.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $813.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $448.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $445.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $325.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $316.9M | $646.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.3B | $470.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.1B | $539.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-942.2M | $571.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.1B | $579.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $436.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $475.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $484.6M |
| Q4 25 | $885.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $328.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $361.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $263.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-50.3M | $20.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-75.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -129.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 43.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-265.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-50.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-65.9M | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-66.1M | $23.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-28.9M | $15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-42.7M | $96.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $19.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $16.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-75.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-82.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-73.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-55.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -129.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -271.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -480.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -323.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -769.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 43.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 180.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.91× | 2.67× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.67× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
