vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EPAM Systems (EPAM) and JBT Marel Corp (JBTM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EPAM Systems is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $1.0B, roughly 1.4× JBT Marel Corp). EPAM Systems runs the higher net margin — 7.8% vs 5.3%, a 2.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, JBT Marel Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (115.6% vs 12.8%). EPAM Systems produced more free cash flow last quarter ($268.1M vs $83.5M). Over the past eight quarters, JBT Marel Corp's revenue compounded faster (60.3% CAGR vs 9.9%).
EPAM Systems, Inc. is an American company that specializes in software engineering services, digital platform engineering, and digital product design, operating out of Newtown, Pennsylvania. EPAM is a founding member of the MACH Alliance.
JBT Marel Corporation, formerly known as JBT Corporation, or John Bean Technologies Corporation, is a food processing machinery and automated vehicle company. The company was incorporated in 2008 when FMC Technologies divested its non-energy businesses. The company is based in Chicago, Illinois and traces its history back to a company founded in 1884 by John Bean, an orchardist in Los Gatos, California.
EPAM vs JBTM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $1.0B |
| Net Profit | $109.4M | $53.1M |
| Gross Margin | 30.1% | 34.5% |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | 7.2% |
| Net Margin | 7.8% | 5.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.8% | 115.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 5.9% | 858.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.97 | $1.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $934.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $854.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $467.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $453.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $402.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $392.3M |
| Q4 25 | $109.4M | $53.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.8M | $66.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.0M | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $73.5M | $-173.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $103.3M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.3M | $38.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.6M | $30.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | $22.8M |
| Q4 25 | 30.1% | 34.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.5% | 35.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.8% | 35.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.9% | 34.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.4% | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.6% | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.3% | 35.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.4% | 35.8% |
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.4% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.6% | -3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | 7.4% |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.6% | -20.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.3% | -1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | 5.8% |
| Q4 25 | $1.97 | $1.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.91 | $1.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.56 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.28 | $-3.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.80 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.37 | $1.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.70 | $0.95 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.97 | $0.71 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3B | $167.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.7B | $4.5B |
| Total Assets | $4.9B | $8.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.33× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $167.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $648.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $647.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $647.0M |
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6B | $4.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $8.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $8.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4B | $2.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.43× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $282.9M | $117.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $268.1M | $83.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.0% | 8.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.59× | 2.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $612.7M | $238.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $282.9M | $117.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $294.7M | $87.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.2M | $102.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.2M | $34.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.3M | $128.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $242.0M | $71.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.0M | $21.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $129.9M | $10.4M |
| Q4 25 | $268.1M | $83.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $286.4M | $56.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.4M | $83.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.8M | $14.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $114.5M | $118.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $237.0M | $65.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.3M | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $123.2M | $-100.0K |
| Q4 25 | 19.0% | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.5% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.2% | 25.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.6% | -0.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 2.7% |
| Q4 25 | 2.59× | 2.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.76× | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.60× | 30.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.26× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.77× | 1.85× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.58× | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.12× | 0.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
