vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EPAM Systems (EPAM) and SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EPAM Systems is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.3× SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL runs the higher net margin — 14.3% vs 7.8%, a 6.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EPAM Systems posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.8% vs 1.7%). EPAM Systems produced more free cash flow last quarter ($268.1M vs $87.2M). Over the past eight quarters, EPAM Systems's revenue compounded faster (9.9% CAGR vs 3.1%).
EPAM Systems, Inc. is an American company that specializes in software engineering services, digital platform engineering, and digital product design, operating out of Newtown, Pennsylvania. EPAM is a founding member of the MACH Alliance.
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
EPAM vs SCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $109.4M | $159.4M |
| Gross Margin | 30.1% | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | 7.8% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.8% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 5.9% | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.97 | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $109.4M | $159.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.8M | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.0M | $122.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $73.5M | $142.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $103.3M | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.3M | $117.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.6M | $118.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | $131.3M |
| Q4 25 | 30.1% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.5% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.8% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.9% | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.4% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.6% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.3% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.4% | 26.2% |
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.4% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.6% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.5% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.6% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.3% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | $1.97 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.91 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.56 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.28 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.80 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.37 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.70 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.97 | $0.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3B | $243.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.7B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $4.9B | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $243.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $227.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $184.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | $205.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.6B |
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $18.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $16.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4B | $16.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.90× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $282.9M | $212.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $268.1M | $87.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.0% | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.59× | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $612.7M | $554.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $282.9M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $294.7M | $252.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.2M | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.2M | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.3M | $264.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $242.0M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.0M | $196.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $129.9M | $220.1M |
| Q4 25 | $268.1M | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $286.4M | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.4M | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.8M | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $114.5M | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $237.0M | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.3M | $100.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $123.2M | $140.3M |
| Q4 25 | 19.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.5% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.2% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.6% | 13.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | 2.59× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.76× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.60× | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.33× | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.26× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.77× | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.58× | 1.67× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.12× | 1.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EPAM
Segment breakdown not available.
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
