vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EPAM Systems (EPAM) and SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC. (SGI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.3× EPAM Systems). EPAM Systems runs the higher net margin — 7.8% vs 7.5%, a 0.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (54.7% vs 12.8%). EPAM Systems produced more free cash flow last quarter ($268.1M vs $41.1M). Over the past eight quarters, SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC.'s revenue compounded faster (25.3% CAGR vs 9.9%).
EPAM Systems, Inc. is an American company that specializes in software engineering services, digital platform engineering, and digital product design, operating out of Newtown, Pennsylvania. EPAM is a founding member of the MACH Alliance.
Somnigroup International Inc. is an American manufacturer of mattresses and bedding products.
EPAM vs SGI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $109.4M | $140.8M |
| Gross Margin | 30.1% | 44.0% |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | 13.2% |
| Net Margin | 7.8% | 7.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.8% | 54.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 5.9% | 95.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.97 | $0.71 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $109.4M | $140.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.8M | $177.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.0M | $99.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $73.5M | $-33.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $103.3M | $71.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.3M | $130.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.6M | $106.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | $76.3M |
| Q4 25 | 30.1% | 44.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.5% | 44.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.8% | 44.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.9% | 36.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.4% | 43.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.6% | 45.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.3% | 44.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.4% | 43.1% |
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.4% | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.6% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | 11.1% |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.5% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.6% | -2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.3% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | 6.4% |
| Q4 25 | $1.97 | $0.71 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.91 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.56 | $0.47 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.28 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.80 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.37 | $0.73 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.70 | $0.60 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.97 | $0.43 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $4.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.7B | $3.1B |
| Total Assets | $4.9B | $11.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.47× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6B | $559.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $564.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $411.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | $326.6M |
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | $11.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $11.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $11.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $11.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4B | $4.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.79× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.69× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.95× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.92× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.74× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $282.9M | $99.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $268.1M | $41.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.0% | 2.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | 3.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.59× | 0.71× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $612.7M | $633.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $282.9M | $99.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $294.7M | $408.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.2M | $186.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.2M | $106.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.3M | $129.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $242.0M | $256.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.0M | $150.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $129.9M | $130.2M |
| Q4 25 | $268.1M | $41.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $286.4M | $360.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.4M | $149.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.8M | $82.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $114.5M | $108.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $237.0M | $240.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.3M | $122.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $123.2M | $98.7M |
| Q4 25 | 19.0% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.5% | 17.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.2% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | 9.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.6% | 8.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 2.6% |
| Q4 25 | 2.59× | 0.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.76× | 2.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.60× | 1.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.26× | 1.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.77× | 1.97× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.58× | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.12× | 1.71× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EPAM
Segment breakdown not available.
SGI
| Mattress Firm Segment | $892.1M | 48% |
| Tempur Sealy North America Segment | $620.5M | 33% |
| Tempur Sealy International Segment | $355.8M | 19% |
