vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC (ESE) and TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC (TCBI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($324.0M vs $289.7M, roughly 1.1× ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC). TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC runs the higher net margin — 22.8% vs 9.9%, a 12.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.3% vs 15.5%). Over the past eight quarters, TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC's revenue compounded faster (10.2% CAGR vs 7.8%).
Esco is a Singaporean brand that develops, manufactures, and sells products and services for laboratories.
Texas Capital Bank is a bank headquartered in Dallas, Texas. The bank has branches located in every major city in Texas. Its parent bank holding company is Texas Capital Bancshares. It also operates an online-only banking division, Bask Bank.
ESE vs TCBI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $289.7M | $324.0M |
| Net Profit | $28.7M | $73.8M |
| Gross Margin | 41.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 13.2% | — |
| Net Margin | 9.9% | 22.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.3% | 15.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 22.2% | 56.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.11 | $1.56 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $324.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $289.7M | $327.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $286.5M | $340.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $296.3M | $307.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.5M | $280.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $247.0M | $229.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.5M | $125.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.8M | $267.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $73.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $28.7M | $100.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.7M | $105.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.1M | $77.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.0M | $47.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.5M | $71.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.3M | $-61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.2M | $41.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.2% | 40.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.2% | 40.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | 33.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | 21.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.4% | 40.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.8% | -63.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.3% | 21.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 22.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | 30.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 76.3% | 30.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | 25.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.7% | 16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | 30.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.5% | -48.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | 15.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.56 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.11 | $2.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.43 | $2.18 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.01 | $1.58 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.20 | $0.92 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.91 | $1.43 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.32 | $-1.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.13 | $0.80 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $103.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $145.5M | $878.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6B | $3.6B |
| Total Assets | $2.4B | $33.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.09× | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $103.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $878.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $145.5M | $620.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $186.0M | $620.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $525.0M | $620.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.0M | $660.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $112.0M | $660.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $122.0M | $660.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.0M | $660.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $3.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $33.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $31.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $32.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $31.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $30.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $29.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.09× | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.12× | 0.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.40× | 0.18× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.07× | 0.19× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.09× | 0.20× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.10× | 0.20× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.14× | 0.21× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $68.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $63.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 21.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.40× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $239.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $68.9M | $360.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.9M | $166.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.7M | $63.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.1M | $368.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.2M | $480.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $332.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.2M | $33.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $63.0M | $347.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $97.8M | $161.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.9M | $57.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.0M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $415.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.9M | $317.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.6M | $11.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.7% | 106.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.1% | 47.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.9% | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.3% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | 180.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.4% | 253.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.6% | 4.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 28.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.8% | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 8.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.40× | 3.58× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.50× | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.83× | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.78× | 0.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.46× | 6.76× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.10× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.24× | 0.80× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ESE
| US Government | $98.0M | 34% |
| Utility Solutions Group | $87.5M | 30% |
| RF Shielding And Test | $58.3M | 20% |
| Commercial | $45.8M | 16% |
| Related Party | $1.3M | 0% |
TCBI
Segment breakdown not available.
