vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. (ESPR) and Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. (PANL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($183.9M vs $168.4M, roughly 1.1× Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.). On growth, Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (143.7% vs 24.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (32.5% CAGR vs 10.6%).
Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. is a publicly traded American pharmaceutical company focused on the development of bempedoic acid, an orally available small molecule designed to lower elevated levels of LDL-C. The company is headquartered in Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. is a global dry bulk logistics and shipping service provider. It operates a modern fleet of dry bulk vessels to transport a wide range of commodities including grains, minerals, construction materials, and energy-related raw materials, serving industrial, agricultural, and energy sector clients across North America, Europe, and Asia with tailored end-to-end bulk cargo supply chain solutions.
ESPR vs PANL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $168.4M | $183.9M |
| Net Profit | — | $11.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 50.6% | 9.5% |
| Net Margin | — | 6.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 143.7% | 24.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 40.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.32 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $168.4M | $183.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.3M | $168.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $82.4M | $156.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.0M | $122.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $69.1M | $147.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.6M | $153.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.8M | $131.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $137.7M | $104.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-31.3M | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.7M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-40.5M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-29.5M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-61.9M | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $61.0M | $11.7M |
| Q4 25 | 50.6% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.4% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.6% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -34.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.4% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -31.0% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.5% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 52.5% | 10.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -35.9% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.4% | -1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -62.2% | -1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -57.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -83.9% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 44.3% | 11.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.32 | $0.18 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.16 | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.06 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.21 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.14 | $0.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.15 | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.33 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.34 | $0.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $167.9M | $103.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $249.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-302.0M | $429.3M |
| Total Assets | $465.9M | $928.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.58× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $167.9M | $103.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $92.4M | $94.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.1M | $59.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $114.6M | $63.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $144.8M | $86.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $144.7M | $93.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $189.3M | $77.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $226.6M | $95.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $249.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $256.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $244.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $251.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $257.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $133.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $90.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $95.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-302.0M | $429.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-451.4M | $420.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-433.5M | $414.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-426.2M | $420.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-388.7M | $427.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-370.2M | $332.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-344.2M | $331.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-294.3M | $332.0M |
| Q4 25 | $465.9M | $928.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $364.0M | $932.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $347.1M | $916.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $324.0M | $918.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $343.8M | $936.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $314.1M | $749.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $352.3M | $692.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $373.1M | $703.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.58× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.61× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.29× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $45.2M | $15.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.27× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $45.2M | $15.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.3M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-31.4M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.6M | $-4.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-35.0M | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-35.3M | $28.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.2M | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $53.8M | $9.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-35.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $53.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -68.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 39.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.57× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.43× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.88× | 0.77× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ESPR
| Collaboration Revenue | $124.7M | 74% |
| Products | $43.7M | 26% |
PANL
| Voyage | $166.3M | 90% |
| Charter | $13.1M | 7% |
| Terminal Stevedore Revenue | $4.4M | 2% |
