vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. (ESPR) and PicoCELA Inc. (PCLA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PicoCELA Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($252.6M vs $168.4M, roughly 1.5× Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.).
Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. is a publicly traded American pharmaceutical company focused on the development of bempedoic acid, an orally available small molecule designed to lower elevated levels of LDL-C. The company is headquartered in Ann Arbor, Michigan.
PicoCELA Inc. is a global technology company specializing in low-power, high-reliability wireless connectivity solutions, including Wi-Fi HaLow modules and edge network infrastructure. It caters to industrial IoT, smart city, retail, and smart home segments, with a primary operational footprint across Asia, North America, and European markets.
ESPR vs PCLA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $168.4M | $252.6M |
| Net Profit | — | $-316.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 50.6% | -114.8% |
| Net Margin | — | -125.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 143.7% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.32 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $168.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $82.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.0M | $252.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $69.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $137.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-31.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-40.5M | $-316.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-29.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-61.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $61.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 50.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -34.0% | -114.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -31.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 52.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -35.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -62.2% | -125.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -57.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -83.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 44.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.32 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.16 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.21 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.14 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.15 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.33 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.34 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $167.9M | $456.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-302.0M | $354.8M |
| Total Assets | $465.9M | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $167.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $92.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $114.6M | $456.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $144.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $144.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $189.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $226.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-302.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-451.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-433.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-426.2M | $354.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-388.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-370.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-344.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-294.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $465.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $364.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $347.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $324.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $343.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $314.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $352.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $373.1M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $45.2M | $-245.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-256.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -101.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 4.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $45.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-31.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.6M | $-245.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-35.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-35.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $53.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-256.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-35.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $53.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -101.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -68.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 39.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.88× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ESPR
| Collaboration Revenue | $124.7M | 74% |
| Products | $43.7M | 26% |
PCLA
| Revenue from product | $179.1M | 71% |
| Revenue from SaaS, Maintenance and others | $42.4M | 17% |
| Revenue from product – related party | $31.0M | 12% |
