vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. (ESPR) and DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC (PLOW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($184.5M vs $168.4M, roughly 1.1× Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.). On growth, Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (143.7% vs 28.6%). Over the past eight quarters, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC's revenue compounded faster (38.9% CAGR vs 10.6%).
Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. is a publicly traded American pharmaceutical company focused on the development of bempedoic acid, an orally available small molecule designed to lower elevated levels of LDL-C. The company is headquartered in Ann Arbor, Michigan.
General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is an American industrial and technology company based in Reston, Virginia. It is primarily a developer and producer of advanced military equipment of a wide variety, such as nuclear submarines, main battle tanks, and armoured fighting vehicles. It is also the manufacturer of the civilian aviation Gulfstream business jets and a provider of information technology services. The company is the 3rd largest of the top 100 contractors of the U.S. federal government...
ESPR vs PLOW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $168.4M | $184.5M |
| Net Profit | — | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | 50.6% | 10.5% |
| Net Margin | — | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 143.7% | 28.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 62.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.32 | $0.54 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $168.4M | $184.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.3M | $162.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $82.4M | $194.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.0M | $115.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $69.1M | $143.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.6M | $129.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.8M | $199.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $137.7M | $95.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-31.3M | $8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.7M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-40.5M | $148.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-29.5M | $32.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-61.9M | $24.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $61.0M | $-8.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 19.8% |
| Q4 25 | 50.6% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.4% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.6% | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -34.0% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.4% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -31.0% | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.5% | 18.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 52.5% | -6.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -35.9% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.4% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -62.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -57.2% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -83.9% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 44.3% | -8.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.32 | $0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.16 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.06 | $1.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.21 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.14 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.15 | $1.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.33 | $1.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.34 | $-0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $167.9M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $144.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-302.0M | $281.4M |
| Total Assets | $465.9M | $626.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $167.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $92.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $114.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $144.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $144.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $189.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $226.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $144.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $147.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-302.0M | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-451.4M | $275.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-433.5M | $273.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-426.2M | $258.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-388.7M | $264.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-370.2M | $260.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-344.2M | $236.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-294.3M | $217.2M |
| Q4 25 | $465.9M | $626.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $364.0M | $694.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $347.1M | $671.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $324.0M | $621.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $343.8M | $590.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $314.1M | $665.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $352.3M | $617.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $373.1M | $577.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $45.2M | $95.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $92.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 50.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 7.47× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $63.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $45.2M | $95.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.3M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-31.4M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.6M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-35.0M | $74.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-35.3M | $-14.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.2M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $53.8M | $-21.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $92.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-14.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $70.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-35.5M | $-15.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.3M | $836.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $53.8M | $-22.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 50.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -68.7% | -11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 39.0% | -23.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -9.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.41× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.10× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.88× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ESPR
| Collaboration Revenue | $124.7M | 74% |
| Products | $43.7M | 26% |
PLOW
| Work Truck Solutions | $101.5M | 55% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $83.1M | 45% |