vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Essex Property Trust (ESS) and PHINIA INC. (PHIN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PHINIA INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($889.0M vs $479.6M, roughly 1.9× Essex Property Trust). On growth, PHINIA INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.7% vs 5.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Essex Property Trust's revenue compounded faster (6.0% CAGR vs 1.5%).
Essex Property Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust that invests in apartments in California and in the Seattle metropolitan area.
PHINIA Inc. is a global automotive technology provider specializing in fuel injection systems, starters, alternators, and hybrid/electric vehicle components. It serves OEMs and aftermarket customers across North America, Europe, Asia Pacific and key markets, covering passenger car, commercial vehicle and industrial mobility segments.
ESS vs PHIN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $479.6M | $889.0M |
| Net Profit | $85.7M | — |
| Gross Margin | 70.0% | 21.7% |
| Operating Margin | 31.7% | 7.8% |
| Net Margin | 17.9% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 5.5% | 6.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -71.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.24 | $1.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $479.6M | $889.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $473.3M | $908.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $469.8M | $890.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $464.6M | $796.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $454.5M | $833.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $450.7M | $839.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $442.4M | $868.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $426.9M | $863.0M |
| Q4 25 | $85.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $172.7M | $13.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $231.5M | $46.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $212.8M | $26.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $301.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $125.5M | $31.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $99.0M | $14.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $285.1M | $29.0M |
| Q4 25 | 70.0% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 69.2% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 70.7% | 22.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 69.6% | 21.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 70.0% | 22.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 69.5% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.8% | 21.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 69.7% | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | 31.7% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.5% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.5% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 55.3% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 67.0% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.6% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.1% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.0% | 8.2% |
| Q4 25 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.3% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.8% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 66.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.8% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.4% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 66.8% | 3.4% |
| Q4 25 | $1.24 | $1.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.56 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.44 | $1.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.16 | $0.63 | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.00 | $0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.84 | $0.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.45 | $0.31 | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.25 | $0.62 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $76.2M | $359.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $970.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.5B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $13.2B | $3.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $76.2M | $359.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.0M | $349.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.7M | $347.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $98.7M | $373.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $66.8M | $484.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $71.3M | $477.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $55.2M | $339.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $499.0M | $325.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $970.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $990.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.4B | $990.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | $989.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $988.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4B | $987.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $821.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.6B | $706.0M |
| Q4 25 | $5.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.5B | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | $13.2B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.2B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.2B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.2B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.9B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.6B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.5B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.9B | $4.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.15× | 0.62× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.14× | 0.61× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.22× | 0.64× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.18× | 0.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.13× | 0.47× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.19× | 0.38× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.1B | $96.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $67.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 7.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 12.53× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $188.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $96.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $342.6M | $119.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $216.1M | $57.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $281.5M | $40.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $73.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $316.2M | $95.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $218.9M | $109.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $314.9M | $31.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $67.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $93.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $23.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $53.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $70.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $92.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-12.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.0% |
| Q4 25 | 12.53× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | 9.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.93× | 1.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.32× | 1.54× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.54× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.52× | 3.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.21× | 7.79× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.10× | 1.07× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ESS
Segment breakdown not available.
PHIN
| Customer | $618.0M | 70% |
| Fuel Systems | $194.0M | 22% |
| Other | $77.0M | 9% |