vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ESTABLISHMENT LABS HOLDINGS INC. (ESTA) and MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ESTABLISHMENT LABS HOLDINGS INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($64.6M vs $40.6M, roughly 1.6× MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp). On growth, ESTABLISHMENT LABS HOLDINGS INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (45.2% vs -20.7%). ESTABLISHMENT LABS HOLDINGS INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-2.0M vs $-4.8M). Over the past eight quarters, ESTABLISHMENT LABS HOLDINGS INC.'s revenue compounded faster (31.9% CAGR vs -3.4%).
Astera Labs, Inc. is an American fabless semiconductor manufacturer and artificial intelligence company. The company specializes in designing high-speed connectivity solutions for data centers and AI infrastructure. The company has been listed on the Nasdaq since March 2024.
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
ESTA vs MX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $64.6M | $40.6M |
| Net Profit | — | $-8.1M |
| Gross Margin | 70.5% | 9.3% |
| Operating Margin | -6.1% | -26.1% |
| Net Margin | — | -19.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 45.2% | -20.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 50.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | $-0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $64.6M | $40.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $53.8M | $45.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.3M | $47.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.4M | $44.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.5M | $51.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.2M | $55.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.1M | $46.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.2M | $43.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.1M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.6M | $323.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.7M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-16.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-16.7M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-17.2M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-16.2M | $-15.4M |
| Q4 25 | 70.5% | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 70.1% | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 68.8% | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 67.2% | 20.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 68.5% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.9% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 65.6% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 65.6% | 14.6% |
| Q4 25 | -6.1% | -26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.5% | -25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -27.5% | -15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -41.0% | -14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -41.9% | -12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -32.7% | -8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -21.2% | -12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.8% | -21.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | -19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.7% | -28.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -32.3% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -50.1% | -19.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -31.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -41.5% | -17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -38.9% | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -43.6% | -35.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.07 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.38 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.57 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.70 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.21 | $-0.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.59 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.62 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.58 | $-0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $75.6M | $103.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $23.5M | $248.3M |
| Total Assets | $357.2M | $351.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $75.6M | $103.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $70.6M | $108.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.6M | $113.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.2M | $132.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.3M | $138.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $151.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $162.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $171.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $23.5M | $248.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.4M | $255.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.8M | $270.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.5M | $269.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $53.1M | $276.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.7M | $299.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.0M | $305.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.9M | $321.9M |
| Q4 25 | $357.2M | $351.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $338.9M | $359.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $329.7M | $370.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $333.4M | $373.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $346.8M | $379.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $282.7M | $411.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $285.1M | $412.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $301.8M | $426.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-162.0K | $5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.0M | $-4.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.1% | -11.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.8% | 25.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-56.9M | $-54.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-162.0K | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.3M | $162.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-18.8M | $-25.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.7M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-20.7M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.5M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.2M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.2M | $-4.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.0M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.1M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.4M | $-37.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.5M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.3M | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-13.9M | $-15.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.0M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-14.5M | $-4.6M |
| Q4 25 | -3.1% | -11.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -24.4% | -16.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -39.7% | -77.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -51.9% | -10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -47.8% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -34.6% | -28.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -33.9% | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -38.9% | -10.7% |
| Q4 25 | 2.8% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.9% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -77.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ESTA
Segment breakdown not available.
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |
