vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX) and NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (NEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($40.6M vs $23.6M, roughly 1.7× NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP). MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp runs the higher net margin — -19.9% vs -677.3%, a 657.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.7% vs -20.7%). Over the past eight quarters, NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP's revenue compounded faster (8.9% CAGR vs -3.4%).
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership is a real estate investment entity that owns, operates and manages residential and commercial properties primarily across the U.S. New England region. Its core assets include multifamily apartments, mixed-use properties and small commercial spaces, serving tenants across Massachusetts, New Hampshire and adjacent states, delivering steady returns to unitholders via rental income and property value growth.
MX vs NEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $40.6M | $23.6M |
| Net Profit | $-8.1M | $-1.4M |
| Gross Margin | 9.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -26.1% | 14.0% |
| Net Margin | -19.9% | -677.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -20.7% | 15.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 50.4% | -133.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.23 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $40.6M | $23.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.9M | $23.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.6M | $21.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.7M | $20.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.2M | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.4M | $20.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.4M | $20.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.4M | $19.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.1M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.1M | $-521.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.0K | $4.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.9M | $3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.3M | $4.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.6M | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-13.0M | $4.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.4M | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | -26.1% | 14.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -25.1% | 20.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.6% | 33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.1% | 30.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.5% | 32.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.1% | 32.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.3% | 32.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.6% | 28.9% |
| Q4 25 | -19.9% | -677.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -28.5% | -2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -19.9% | 18.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -31.8% | 20.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.3% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -28.0% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.5% | 17.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.23 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.36 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.24 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.44 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.26 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.34 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.40 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $103.8M | $26.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $531.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $248.3M | — |
| Total Assets | $351.5M | $505.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $103.8M | $26.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.0M | $13.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $113.3M | $16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.7M | $30.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.6M | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $151.1M | $15.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $162.5M | $13.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $171.6M | $28.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $531.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $514.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $514.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $407.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $408.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $409.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $410.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $410.7M |
| Q4 25 | $248.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $270.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $269.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $299.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $305.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $351.5M | $505.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $359.6M | $492.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $370.5M | $494.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $373.9M | $385.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $379.3M | $393.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $411.4M | $387.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $412.7M | $383.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $426.2M | $381.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.4M | $27.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-4.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -11.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 25.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-54.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | $27.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.0K | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-25.1M | $12.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | $5.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $31.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.9M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1M | $5.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $6.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-4.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-37.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | -11.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -28.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.81× | 3.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.77× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |
NEN
Segment breakdown not available.
