vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of enCore Energy Corp. (EU) and Tectonic Financial, Inc. (TECTP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tectonic Financial, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($23.0M vs $12.4M, roughly 1.9× enCore Energy Corp.). Tectonic Financial, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 23.8% vs -173.9%, a 197.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. enCore Energy Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($7.2M vs $-17.3M).
Devon Energy Corporation is an American company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is organized in Delaware with operational headquarters in the 50-story Devon Energy Center in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Its operations are in the Delaware Basin, Eagle Ford Group, and the Rocky Mountains.
Tectonic Financial, Inc.TECTPEarnings & Financial Report
Tectonic Financial, Inc. is a US-based diversified financial services provider. It offers core services including wealth management, investment banking, capital markets advisory, and tailored financial solutions. Its key client segments cover high-net-worth individuals, institutional investors, and small to mid-sized enterprises across North America.
EU vs TECTP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $12.4M | $23.0M |
| Net Profit | $-21.5M | $5.5M |
| Gross Margin | 37.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -135.9% | 30.6% |
| Net Margin | -173.9% | 23.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 17.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 15.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $0.73 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $12.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9M | $23.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7M | $21.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.2M | $21.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $21.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $19.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $18.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $17.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-21.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | $5.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.3M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-24.2M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.1M |
| Q4 25 | 37.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -135.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -158.2% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -526.1% | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -85.7% | 26.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | -173.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -53.7% | 23.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -172.7% | 19.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -132.9% | 20.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 17.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.03 | $0.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | $0.55 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.13 | $0.57 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.38 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $52.4M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $110.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $229.2M | $119.2M |
| Total Assets | $430.4M | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.48× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $52.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $110.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $229.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $248.6M | $119.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $264.7M | $114.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $267.9M | $111.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $113.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $112.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $110.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $108.5M |
| Q4 25 | $430.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $441.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $359.4M | $997.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.6M | $910.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $863.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $847.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $777.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $777.6M |
| Q4 25 | 0.48× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $12.9M | $-17.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $7.2M | $-17.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 57.8% | -74.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 46.7% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -3.14× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-45.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $12.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.3M | $-17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.9M | $-32.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.7M | $-35.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-86.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-22.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-30.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.2M |
| Q4 25 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-26.3M | $-17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-14.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.7M | $-35.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-86.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-22.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-30.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.3M |
| Q4 25 | 57.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -296.6% | -74.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -385.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -64.1% | -163.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -406.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -115.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -165.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -18.8% |
| Q4 25 | 46.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 68.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 115.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -3.14× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -7.61× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -8.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -28.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -4.74× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -9.76× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.03× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.