vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EUDA Health Holdings Ltd (EUDA) and mF International Ltd (MFI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
mF International Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9M vs $1.7M, roughly 1.1× EUDA Health Holdings Ltd). mF International Ltd runs the higher net margin — -90.9% vs -142.1%, a 51.3% gap on every dollar of revenue.
EUDA Health Holdings Ltd is a digital health enterprise focused on evidence-based mental wellness solutions. It offers AI-powered mental health assessment tools, therapy matching services, and personalized care programs, primarily serving consumer and corporate clients across the Asia-Pacific region with core segments including mental health screening, employee wellness programs and consumer mental support platforms.
MF Global Holdings Ltd., formerly known as Man Financial, was a major global financial derivatives broker, or commodities brokerage firm that went bankrupt in 2011. MF Global provided exchange-traded derivatives, such as futures and options as well as over-the-counter products such as contracts for difference (CFDs), foreign exchange and spread betting. MF Global Inc., its broker-dealer subsidiary, was a primary dealer in United States Treasury securities. A series of perceived liquidity prob...
EUDA vs MFI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2023 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7M | $1.9M |
| Net Profit | $-2.4M | $-1.7M |
| Gross Margin | 23.8% | 35.5% |
| Operating Margin | -116.4% | -93.4% |
| Net Margin | -142.1% | -90.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 20.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -973.7% | -145.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.12 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 23 | $1.7M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-710.3K | ||
| Q1 23 | $-2.4M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | 35.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 42.4% | ||
| Q1 23 | 23.8% | — |
| Q2 25 | — | -93.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -50.7% | ||
| Q1 23 | -116.4% | — |
| Q2 25 | — | -90.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -44.5% | ||
| Q1 23 | -142.1% | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 23 | $-0.12 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $837.3K | $1.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $518.6K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-6.0M | $2.8M |
| Total Assets | $25.5M | $5.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.18× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 23 | $837.3K | — |
| Q2 25 | — | $518.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.0M | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.5M | ||
| Q1 23 | $-6.0M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | $5.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.3M | ||
| Q1 23 | $25.5M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-469.9K | $-335.3K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-339.2K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -17.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | — | $-335.3K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 23 | $-469.9K | — |
| Q2 25 | — | $-339.2K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | -17.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -142.0% | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
