vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. (EVLV) and LandBridge Co LLC (LB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LandBridge Co LLC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($56.8M vs $38.5M, roughly 1.5× Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc.). Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 28.3% vs 14.2%, a 14.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LandBridge Co LLC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (55.6% vs 32.3%). Over the past eight quarters, LandBridge Co LLC's revenue compounded faster (72.8% CAGR vs 31.8%).
Sentient Technologies was an American artificial intelligence technology company based in San Francisco. Sentient was founded in 2007 and received over $143 million in funding at different points after its inception. As of 2016, Sentient was the world's most well-funded AI company. It focused on e-commerce, online content and trading.
EVLV vs LB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $38.5M | $56.8M |
| Net Profit | $10.9M | $8.1M |
| Gross Margin | 48.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -20.7% | 60.0% |
| Net Margin | 28.3% | 14.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.3% | 55.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 169.2% | -83.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.07 | $0.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $38.5M | $56.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.9M | $50.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.5M | $47.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.0M | $44.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.1M | $36.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.4M | $28.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.2M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.2M | $19.0M |
| Q4 25 | $10.9M | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.8M | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-40.5M | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | $6.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-15.7M | $49.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-30.4M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $-57.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.3M | $10.8M |
| Q4 25 | 48.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 49.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 59.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 57.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 57.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 58.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -20.7% | 60.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.1% | 60.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -53.8% | 60.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -45.0% | 57.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -64.9% | 49.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -70.0% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -88.7% | -197.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -98.8% | 71.1% |
| Q4 25 | 28.3% | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.2% | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -124.6% | 15.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.3% | 14.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -54.0% | 135.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -111.3% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.6% | -222.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -50.8% | 56.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.07 | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.01 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.25 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.01 | $0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.19 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.07 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $49.1M | $30.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $28.6M | $570.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.4M | $340.3M |
| Total Assets | $304.4M | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.24× | 1.68× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $49.1M | $30.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.2M | $28.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.9M | $20.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.0M | $14.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.9M | $37.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $56.0M | $14.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.5M | $24.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $28.6M | $570.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.5M | $366.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $370.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $375.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | $385.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $242.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $360.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $119.4M | $340.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $102.2M | $272.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.7M | $266.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $121.1M | $217.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $117.7M | $211.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $129.0M | $97.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $151.2M | $296.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $139.8M | $162.3M |
| Q4 25 | $304.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $304.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $280.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $256.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $268.1M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $278.5M | $689.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $269.1M | $710.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $280.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.24× | 1.68× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.28× | 1.35× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.39× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | 1.82× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.49× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.6M | $126.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $122.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 214.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 7.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.43× | 15.68× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $207.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.6M | $126.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5M | $34.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $37.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.5M | $15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | $67.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.6M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-16.2M | $17.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $122.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $33.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $36.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $66.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $15.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $17.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 214.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 66.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 75.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 182.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 60.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 90.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | 1.43× | 15.68× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.80× | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.31× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.60× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
