vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. (EVTV) and Opus Genetics, Inc. (IRD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Opus Genetics, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.9M vs $2.5M, roughly 1.6× Envirotech Vehicles, Inc.). On growth, Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (908.5% vs -10.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Envirotech Vehicles, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (75.2% CAGR vs 50.3%).
Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. is a provider of zero-emission commercial electric vehicles, with product lines covering light-duty delivery vans, medium-duty work trucks, and purpose-built special electric vehicles. It mainly serves North American logistics, municipal services, and last-mile delivery segments, supporting custom vehicle configuration to match clients' specific operational requirements.
Opus Genetics, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company specializing in the development of targeted gene therapies for inherited retinal diseases. It focuses on addressing unmet medical needs for patients living with rare, vision-threatening ocular conditions, with operations centered on advancing accessible therapeutic candidates for global rare disease patient populations.
EVTV vs IRD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.5M | $3.9M |
| Net Profit | $-13.6M | — |
| Gross Margin | -479.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | -566.0% | — |
| Net Margin | -545.9% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 908.5% | -10.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -484.0% | 53.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.5M | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8M | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0M | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $590.6K | $4.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $246.8K | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $812.8K | $1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $810.5K | $1.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-13.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.4M | $-17.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.1M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.0M | $-8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.2M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-755.1K | $-7.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.5M | $-7.1M |
| Q4 25 | -479.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -139.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -566.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -334.5% | -269.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -458.4% | -309.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2325.2% | -227.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -207.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -163.0% | -748.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -364.8% | -450.5% |
| Q4 25 | -545.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -350.8% | -566.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -491.6% | -257.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2376.8% | -187.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -194.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -92.9% | -698.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -559.2% | -415.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.25 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.29 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.30 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $359.0K | $45.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $485.8K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-8.9M | $15.3M |
| Total Assets | $4.7M | $50.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $359.0K | $45.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.6K | $30.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $942.2K | $32.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $211.3K | $41.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9M | $30.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $682.7K | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $437.1K | $41.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0M | $47.2M |
| Q4 25 | $485.8K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $918.1K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-8.9M | $15.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9M | $6.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9M | $17.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.2M | $5.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.9M | $6.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.0M | $34.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.1M | $40.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.5M | $46.1M |
| Q4 25 | $4.7M | $50.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.2M | $36.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.7M | $38.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.8M | $48.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.7M | $36.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.8M | $40.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.5M | $44.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.2M | $51.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.54× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.84× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.16× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $708.3K | $-35.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $708.3K | $-35.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-910.4K | $-6.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.2M | $-10.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.2M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.5M | $-25.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-965.0K | $-7.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-735.6K | $-5.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -744.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1594.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -135.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 174.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
