vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Take-Two Interactive (TTWO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Diamondback Energy is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.4B vs $1.7B, roughly 2.0× Take-Two Interactive). Take-Two Interactive runs the higher net margin — -5.5% vs -43.2%, a 37.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Take-Two Interactive posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (24.9% vs -9.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Diamondback Energy's revenue compounded faster (23.1% CAGR vs 10.2%).

Diamondback Energy, headquartered in Midland, Texas, is an American company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration in the Permian Basin.

Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. is an American video game holding company based in New York City founded by Ryan Brant in September 1993.

FANG vs TTWO — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
FANG
FANG
2.0× larger
FANG
$3.4B
$1.7B
TTWO
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
TTWO
TTWO
+34.0% gap
TTWO
24.9%
-9.0%
FANG
Higher net margin
TTWO
TTWO
37.7% more per $
TTWO
-5.5%
-43.2%
FANG
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
FANG
FANG
Annualised
FANG
23.1%
10.2%
TTWO

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
FANG
FANG
TTWO
TTWO
Revenue
$3.4B
$1.7B
Net Profit
$-1.5B
$-92.9M
Gross Margin
55.7%
Operating Margin
-82.4%
-2.3%
Net Margin
-43.2%
-5.5%
Revenue YoY
-9.0%
24.9%
Net Profit YoY
-235.8%
25.8%
EPS (diluted)
$-4.99
$-0.50

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FANG
FANG
TTWO
TTWO
Q4 25
$3.4B
$1.7B
Q3 25
$3.9B
$1.8B
Q2 25
$3.7B
$1.5B
Q1 25
$4.0B
$1.6B
Q4 24
$3.7B
$1.4B
Q3 24
$2.6B
$1.4B
Q2 24
$2.5B
$1.3B
Q1 24
$2.2B
$1.4B
Net Profit
FANG
FANG
TTWO
TTWO
Q4 25
$-1.5B
$-92.9M
Q3 25
$1.0B
$-133.9M
Q2 25
$699.0M
$-11.9M
Q1 25
$1.4B
$-3.7B
Q4 24
$1.1B
$-125.2M
Q3 24
$659.0M
$-365.5M
Q2 24
$837.0M
$-262.0M
Q1 24
$768.0M
$-2.9B
Gross Margin
FANG
FANG
TTWO
TTWO
Q4 25
55.7%
Q3 25
55.3%
Q2 25
62.8%
Q1 25
50.8%
Q4 24
55.9%
Q3 24
53.8%
Q2 24
57.6%
Q1 24
33.5%
Operating Margin
FANG
FANG
TTWO
TTWO
Q4 25
-82.4%
-2.3%
Q3 25
31.5%
-5.5%
Q2 25
31.0%
1.4%
Q1 25
41.3%
-238.7%
Q4 24
38.0%
-9.7%
Q3 24
26.8%
-22.0%
Q2 24
46.6%
-13.8%
Q1 24
50.2%
-193.9%
Net Margin
FANG
FANG
TTWO
TTWO
Q4 25
-43.2%
-5.5%
Q3 25
25.9%
-7.5%
Q2 25
19.0%
-0.8%
Q1 25
34.7%
-235.5%
Q4 24
28.9%
-9.2%
Q3 24
24.9%
-27.0%
Q2 24
33.7%
-19.6%
Q1 24
34.5%
-207.4%
EPS (diluted)
FANG
FANG
TTWO
TTWO
Q4 25
$-4.99
$-0.50
Q3 25
$3.51
$-0.73
Q2 25
$2.38
$-0.07
Q1 25
$4.83
$-21.27
Q4 24
$3.40
$-0.71
Q3 24
$3.19
$-2.08
Q2 24
$4.66
$-1.52
Q1 24
$4.28
$-17.05

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FANG
FANG
TTWO
TTWO
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$104.0M
$2.4B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$13.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$37.0B
$3.5B
Total Assets
$71.1B
$10.0B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.37×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FANG
FANG
TTWO
TTWO
Q4 25
$104.0M
$2.4B
Q3 25
$159.0M
$2.1B
Q2 25
$219.0M
$2.0B
Q1 25
$1.8B
$1.5B
Q4 24
$161.0M
$1.2B
Q3 24
$370.0M
$879.6M
Q2 24
$6.9B
$1.1B
Q1 24
$896.0M
$776.0M
Total Debt
FANG
FANG
TTWO
TTWO
Q4 25
$13.7B
Q3 25
$15.8B
Q2 25
$15.1B
Q1 25
$13.0B
Q4 24
$12.1B
Q3 24
$11.9B
Q2 24
$12.0B
Q1 24
$6.6B
Stockholders' Equity
FANG
FANG
TTWO
TTWO
Q4 25
$37.0B
$3.5B
Q3 25
$39.1B
$3.4B
Q2 25
$38.9B
$3.5B
Q1 25
$38.5B
$2.1B
Q4 24
$37.7B
$5.7B
Q3 24
$37.4B
$5.8B
Q2 24
$17.4B
$6.0B
Q1 24
$16.9B
$5.7B
Total Assets
FANG
FANG
TTWO
TTWO
Q4 25
$71.1B
$10.0B
Q3 25
$76.2B
$10.1B
Q2 25
$71.9B
$9.7B
Q1 25
$70.1B
$9.2B
Q4 24
$67.3B
$12.7B
Q3 24
$65.7B
$13.1B
Q2 24
$35.6B
$12.9B
Q1 24
$29.7B
$12.2B
Debt / Equity
FANG
FANG
TTWO
TTWO
Q4 25
0.37×
Q3 25
0.41×
Q2 25
0.39×
Q1 25
0.34×
Q4 24
0.32×
Q3 24
0.32×
Q2 24
0.69×
Q1 24
0.39×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FANG
FANG
TTWO
TTWO
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$2.3B
$305.2M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$236.2M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
13.9%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
4.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$487.8M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FANG
FANG
TTWO
TTWO
Q4 25
$2.3B
$305.2M
Q3 25
$2.4B
$128.4M
Q2 25
$1.7B
$-44.7M
Q1 25
$2.4B
$279.0M
Q4 24
$2.3B
$-4.8M
Q3 24
$1.2B
$-128.4M
Q2 24
$1.5B
$-191.0M
Q1 24
$1.3B
$-8.9M
Free Cash Flow
FANG
FANG
TTWO
TTWO
Q4 25
$236.2M
Q3 25
$96.5M
Q2 25
$-69.8M
Q1 25
$224.9M
Q4 24
$-48.2M
Q3 24
$-165.2M
Q2 24
$-226.1M
Q1 24
$-55.1M
FCF Margin
FANG
FANG
TTWO
TTWO
Q4 25
13.9%
Q3 25
5.4%
Q2 25
-4.6%
Q1 25
14.2%
Q4 24
-3.5%
Q3 24
-12.2%
Q2 24
-16.9%
Q1 24
-3.9%
Capex Intensity
FANG
FANG
TTWO
TTWO
Q4 25
4.1%
Q3 25
1.8%
Q2 25
1.7%
Q1 25
3.4%
Q4 24
3.2%
Q3 24
2.7%
Q2 24
2.6%
Q1 24
3.3%
Cash Conversion
FANG
FANG
TTWO
TTWO
Q4 25
Q3 25
2.34×
Q2 25
2.40×
Q1 25
1.68×
Q4 24
2.18×
Q3 24
1.83×
Q2 24
1.83×
Q1 24
1.74×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

FANG
FANG

Oil Explorationand Production$2.7B81%
Oil Purchased$308.0M9%
Natural Gas Liquids Production$293.0M9%
Natural Gas Production$4.0M0%

TTWO
TTWO

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons