vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) and SCANSOURCE, INC. (SCSC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $766.5M, roughly 1.4× SCANSOURCE, INC.). Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 7.1% vs 2.2%, a 4.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SCANSOURCE, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.5% vs -2.4%). Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($183.7M vs $28.9M). Over the past eight quarters, SCANSOURCE, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (0.9% CAGR vs -1.5%).
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is an American manufacturer of home and security products, headquartered in Deerfield, Illinois. Its portfolio of businesses and brands includes Moen and the House of Rohl; outdoor living and security products from Therma-Tru, Larson, Fiberon, Master Lock and SentrySafe; and MasterBrand Cabinets. Fortune Brands is a Fortune 500 company and part of the S&P 400 Index. As of December 31, 2021, the company reported employing approximately 28,000 associates and pos...
ScanSource, Inc. is a leading global specialty technology distributor offering a broad portfolio of solutions including point-of-sale systems, barcode scanning tools, cybersecurity products, cloud services and communication solutions. It primarily serves value-added resellers, managed service providers and enterprise clients across North America, Latin America and Europe, covering retail, healthcare, industrial and public sector core segments.
FBIN vs SCSC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $766.5M |
| Net Profit | $76.3M | $16.5M |
| Gross Margin | 43.8% | 13.4% |
| Operating Margin | 11.3% | 2.3% |
| Net Margin | 7.1% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.4% | 2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -27.3% | -3.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.63 | $0.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $766.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $739.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $812.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $704.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $747.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $775.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $746.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $752.6M |
| Q4 25 | $76.3M | $16.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $70.8M | $19.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.3M | $20.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.4M | $17.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $105.0M | $17.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.6M | $17.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.9M | $16.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $96.4M | $12.8M |
| Q4 25 | 43.8% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.2% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.1% | 12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.0% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.0% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.9% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.6% | 13.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.9% | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | 11.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.0% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.3% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.4% | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.8% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.0% | 2.3% |
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.2% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.3% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.8% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.63 | $0.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.59 | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.83 | $0.87 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.42 | $0.74 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.84 | $0.70 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.09 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.06 | $0.66 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.76 | $0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $264.0M | $83.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.5B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.4B | $910.9M |
| Total Assets | $6.5B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.07× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $264.0M | $83.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.9M | $124.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $234.7M | $126.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $340.0M | $146.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $381.1M | $110.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $344.8M | $145.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $352.6M | $185.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $359.7M | $159.1M |
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $910.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $914.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $906.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $901.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $900.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $920.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $924.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $944.1M |
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.8B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.91× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.93× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.16× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.10× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.12× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.15× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.17× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $208.2M | $30.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $183.7M | $28.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 17.0% | 3.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.3% | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.73× | 1.87× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $366.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $208.2M | $30.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $204.4M | $23.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $149.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-83.4M | $66.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $272.3M | $-6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $205.3M | $44.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $261.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-71.3M | $160.2M |
| Q4 25 | $183.7M | $28.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $177.0M | $20.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-112.6M | $64.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $212.1M | $-8.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $175.6M | $42.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $222.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-135.9M | $157.7M |
| Q4 25 | 17.0% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.4% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.9% | 9.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.2% | -1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -12.2% | 21.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.8% | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | 2.73× | 1.87× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.89× | 1.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.62× | 3.79× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.59× | -0.36× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.50× | 2.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.95× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.74× | 12.51× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FBIN
| Wholesale Retail Trade | $526.7M | 49% |
| Home Center Retailer | $257.1M | 24% |
| Security Segment | $165.8M | 15% |
| Other Retailer | $118.2M | 11% |
SCSC
| Products And Services | $723.4M | 94% |
| Intelisys Advisory | $25.0M | 3% |
| Recurring Revenue | $18.2M | 2% |
