vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc. (FBYD) and Opus Genetics, Inc. (IRD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.6M vs $3.9M, roughly 1.7× Opus Genetics, Inc.). On growth, Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (383.5% vs -10.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (108.4% CAGR vs 50.3%).
500 Global is an early-stage venture fund and seed accelerator founded in 2010 by Dave McClure and Christine Tsai. The fund admitted a first "class" of twelve startups to its incubator office in Mountain View, California in February 2011. They expanded to a second class of 21 in June 2011 and a third class of 34 in October 2011. 500 Global has $2.3 billion in assets under management (AUM) as of March 2024.
Opus Genetics, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company specializing in the development of targeted gene therapies for inherited retinal diseases. It focuses on addressing unmet medical needs for patients living with rare, vision-threatening ocular conditions, with operations centered on advancing accessible therapeutic candidates for global rare disease patient populations.
FBYD vs IRD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.6M | $3.9M |
| Net Profit | $-296.0K | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -30.9% | — |
| Net Margin | -4.5% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 383.5% | -10.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 97.5% | 53.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $6.6M | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5M | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7M | $4.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4M | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1M | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8M | $1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5M | $1.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-296.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.4M | $-17.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.1M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.1M | $-8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.3M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.0M | $-7.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $114.0M | $-7.1M |
| Q4 25 | -30.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -90.9% | -269.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -53.0% | -309.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -371.1% | -227.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -335.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -118.9% | -207.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -195.9% | -748.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -350.5% | -450.5% |
| Q4 25 | -4.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -256.8% | -566.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 985.2% | -257.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -473.8% | -187.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -871.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1899.5% | -194.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 446.5% | -698.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7521.4% | -415.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.13 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.30 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.13 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.39 | $-0.29 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.27 | $-0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9M | $45.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $15.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.9M | $15.3M |
| Total Assets | $66.7M | $50.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.31× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.9M | $45.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.3M | $30.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.1M | $32.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $41.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $825.0K | $30.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $828.0K | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | $41.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1M | $47.2M |
| Q4 25 | $15.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $11.9M | $15.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.2M | $6.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $414.0K | $17.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.6M | $5.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.0M | $6.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.4M | $34.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-44.7M | $40.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-61.7M | $46.1M |
| Q4 25 | $66.7M | $50.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.8M | $36.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $89.2M | $38.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.7M | $48.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.2M | $36.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.5M | $40.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.9M | $44.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $67.8M | $51.8M |
| Q4 25 | 1.31× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.3M | $-35.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-4.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -66.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-4.3M | $-35.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.3M | $-6.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.9M | $-10.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $945.0K | $-9.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.8M | $-25.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.6M | $-7.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.8M | $-5.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-4.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $853.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | -66.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -329.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -278.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -114.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -145.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -248.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.31× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.33× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.03× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
