vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORP (FCF) and Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($133.7M vs $93.7M, roughly 1.4× Ranpak Holdings Corp.). On growth, FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.0% vs 2.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Ranpak Holdings Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (13.7% CAGR vs 5.5%).
First Commonwealth Financial Corp is a Pennsylvania-based regional financial services holding company. It offers consumer and commercial banking products, loans, wealth management, and insurance services for individuals, small and mid-sized enterprises across central and western Pennsylvania and Ohio.
Ranpak Holdings Corp. manufactures machines and paper products used in protective paper-based packing for shipping goods and merchandise for e-commerce and industry, along with automation solutions. The company is based in Concord, Ohio, and has production facilities and offices in Reno, Nevada; Kansas City, Missouri; the Netherlands; Czech Republic; Shanghai and Singapore. The paper packaging material can be used for multiple applications like wrapping, cushioning, void fill and cold chain p...
FCF vs PACK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $133.7M | $93.7M |
| Net Profit | $37.5M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 39.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | -1.0% |
| Net Margin | 28.1% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 13.0% | 2.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 14.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.37 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $133.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $137.9M | $93.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $136.0M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $131.0M | $77.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $118.0M | $77.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $120.4M | $91.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $121.2M | $78.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $120.2M | $72.8M |
| Q1 26 | $37.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $44.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.3M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.4M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.7M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.1M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $37.1M | $5.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 39.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 39.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 40.9% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.1% | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.1% | -12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.8% | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.4% | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.7% | -7.1% |
| Q1 26 | 28.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.4% | -12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.5% | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.7% | -14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.5% | -10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.9% | 7.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.37 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.44 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.39 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.32 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.32 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.35 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.31 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.36 | $0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $63.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $154.9M | $401.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6B | $534.9M |
| Total Assets | $12.3B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.10× | 0.75× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $49.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $49.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $65.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $76.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $69.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $65.1M |
| Q1 26 | $154.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $261.7M | $401.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $262.1M | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $262.4M | $403.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $262.7M | $405.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $263.0M | $406.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.3M | $403.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $136.6M | $396.1M |
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $534.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $537.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $539.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $544.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $548.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $564.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $566.2M |
| Q1 26 | $12.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.6B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | 0.10× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.17× | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.17× | 0.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.17× | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.18× | 0.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.19× | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.10× | 0.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.10× | 0.70× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $19.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $187.5M | $19.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.5M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.4M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.9M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.5M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $53.6M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.7M | $19.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $171.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $113.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 124.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 94.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.18× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.20× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.91× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.71× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.67× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.61× | 3.56× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FCF
Segment breakdown not available.
PACK
| Other | $47.9M | 51% |
| Europe And Asia Segment | $45.8M | 49% |
