vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of FirstEnergy (FE) and Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

FirstEnergy is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.8B vs $2.6B, roughly 1.4× Vertiv Holdings Co). Vertiv Holdings Co runs the higher net margin — 14.7% vs -1.3%, a 16.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vertiv Holdings Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.1% vs 19.6%). Vertiv Holdings Co produced more free cash flow last quarter ($652.8M vs $-30.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Vertiv Holdings Co's revenue compounded faster (16.5% CAGR vs 7.5%).

FirstEnergy Corp. is an electric utility headquartered in Akron, Ohio. It was established when Ohio Edison merged with Centerior Energy in 1997.

Vertiv is an American multinational provider of critical infrastructure and services for data centers, communication networks, and commercial and industrial environments.

FE vs VRT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
FE
FE
1.4× larger
FE
$3.8B
$2.6B
VRT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
VRT
VRT
+10.6% gap
VRT
30.1%
19.6%
FE
Higher net margin
VRT
VRT
16.0% more per $
VRT
14.7%
-1.3%
FE
More free cash flow
VRT
VRT
$682.8M more FCF
VRT
$652.8M
$-30.0M
FE
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
VRT
VRT
Annualised
VRT
16.5%
7.5%
FE

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
FE
FE
VRT
VRT
Revenue
$3.8B
$2.6B
Net Profit
$-49.0M
$390.1M
Gross Margin
37.7%
Operating Margin
-0.6%
Net Margin
-1.3%
14.7%
Revenue YoY
19.6%
30.1%
Net Profit YoY
-118.8%
137.1%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.08
$0.99

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FE
FE
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$2.6B
Q4 25
$3.8B
$2.9B
Q3 25
$4.1B
$2.7B
Q2 25
$3.4B
$2.6B
Q1 25
$3.8B
$2.0B
Q4 24
$3.2B
$2.3B
Q3 24
$3.7B
$2.1B
Q2 24
$3.3B
$2.0B
Net Profit
FE
FE
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$390.1M
Q4 25
$-49.0M
$445.6M
Q3 25
$441.0M
$398.5M
Q2 25
$268.0M
$324.2M
Q1 25
$360.0M
$164.5M
Q4 24
$261.0M
$147.0M
Q3 24
$419.0M
$176.6M
Q2 24
$45.0M
$178.1M
Gross Margin
FE
FE
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
37.7%
Q4 25
38.9%
Q3 25
37.8%
Q2 25
34.0%
Q1 25
33.7%
Q4 24
37.1%
Q3 24
36.5%
Q2 24
38.0%
Operating Margin
FE
FE
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
Q4 25
-0.6%
20.1%
Q3 25
20.0%
19.3%
Q2 25
19.1%
16.8%
Q1 25
20.0%
14.3%
Q4 24
19.3%
19.5%
Q3 24
19.5%
17.9%
Q2 24
12.9%
17.2%
Net Margin
FE
FE
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
14.7%
Q4 25
-1.3%
15.5%
Q3 25
10.6%
14.9%
Q2 25
7.9%
12.3%
Q1 25
9.6%
8.1%
Q4 24
8.2%
6.3%
Q3 24
11.2%
8.5%
Q2 24
1.4%
9.1%
EPS (diluted)
FE
FE
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$0.99
Q4 25
$-0.08
$1.14
Q3 25
$0.76
$1.02
Q2 25
$0.46
$0.83
Q1 25
$0.62
$0.42
Q4 24
$0.45
$0.38
Q3 24
$0.73
$0.46
Q2 24
$0.08
$0.46

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FE
FE
VRT
VRT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$57.0M
$2.5B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$25.5B
$0
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$12.5B
$4.2B
Total Assets
$55.9B
$13.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
2.04×
0.00×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FE
FE
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$2.5B
Q4 25
$57.0M
$1.7B
Q3 25
$1.4B
$1.4B
Q2 25
$569.0M
$1.6B
Q1 25
$132.0M
$1.5B
Q4 24
$111.0M
$1.2B
Q3 24
$439.0M
$908.7M
Q2 24
$60.0M
$579.7M
Total Debt
FE
FE
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$0
Q4 25
$25.5B
$2.9B
Q3 25
$25.5B
$2.9B
Q2 25
$23.7B
$2.9B
Q1 25
$21.2B
$2.9B
Q4 24
$22.5B
$2.9B
Q3 24
$21.6B
$2.9B
Q2 24
$20.8B
$2.9B
Stockholders' Equity
FE
FE
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$4.2B
Q4 25
$12.5B
$3.9B
Q3 25
$12.8B
$3.5B
Q2 25
$12.9B
$3.1B
Q1 25
$12.6B
$2.7B
Q4 24
$12.5B
$2.4B
Q3 24
$12.4B
$1.8B
Q2 24
$12.5B
$1.5B
Total Assets
FE
FE
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$13.4B
Q4 25
$55.9B
$12.2B
Q3 25
$55.9B
$10.8B
Q2 25
$54.2B
$10.4B
Q1 25
$52.8B
$9.5B
Q4 24
$52.0B
$9.1B
Q3 24
$50.8B
$8.9B
Q2 24
$51.0B
$8.1B
Debt / Equity
FE
FE
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
0.00×
Q4 25
2.04×
0.74×
Q3 25
1.99×
0.83×
Q2 25
1.85×
0.93×
Q1 25
1.69×
1.10×
Q4 24
1.81×
1.20×
Q3 24
1.74×
1.62×
Q2 24
1.67×
1.91×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FE
FE
VRT
VRT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$1.1B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-30.0M
$652.8M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-0.8%
24.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
30.7%
4.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-1.0B
$2.3B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FE
FE
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$1.1B
$978.9M
Q3 25
$845.0M
$508.7M
Q2 25
$1.1B
$322.9M
Q1 25
$637.0M
$303.3M
Q4 24
$1.0B
$425.2M
Q3 24
$775.0M
$378.2M
Q2 24
$1.1B
$378.4M
Free Cash Flow
FE
FE
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$652.8M
Q4 25
$-30.0M
$885.6M
Q3 25
$-471.0M
$463.5M
Q2 25
$-136.0M
$277.9M
Q1 25
$-368.0M
$266.8M
Q4 24
$-250.0M
$364.5M
Q3 24
$-229.0M
$341.8M
Q2 24
$170.0M
$344.3M
FCF Margin
FE
FE
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
24.6%
Q4 25
-0.8%
30.8%
Q3 25
-11.4%
17.3%
Q2 25
-4.0%
10.5%
Q1 25
-9.8%
13.1%
Q4 24
-7.9%
15.5%
Q3 24
-6.1%
16.5%
Q2 24
5.2%
17.6%
Capex Intensity
FE
FE
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
4.2%
Q4 25
30.7%
3.2%
Q3 25
31.7%
1.7%
Q2 25
36.0%
1.7%
Q1 25
26.7%
1.8%
Q4 24
40.7%
2.6%
Q3 24
26.9%
1.8%
Q2 24
28.7%
1.7%
Cash Conversion
FE
FE
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.20×
Q3 25
1.92×
1.28×
Q2 25
4.04×
1.00×
Q1 25
1.77×
1.84×
Q4 24
4.00×
2.89×
Q3 24
1.85×
2.14×
Q2 24
24.71×
2.12×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

FE
FE

Integrated Segment$1.4B37%
Other$1.4B36%
Stand Alone Transmission Segment$466.0M12%
Industrial Customers$167.0M4%
Mid Atlantic Interstate Transmission LLC$118.0M3%
Transmission$105.0M3%
Transmission Segment$68.0M2%
Tr AIL$63.0M2%
Internal Customers$10.0M0%
Wholesale Sales$6.0M0%

VRT
VRT

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons