vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ENvue Medical, Inc. (FEED) and Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Nakamoto Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($444.9K vs $312.0K, roughly 1.4× ENvue Medical, Inc.). Nakamoto Inc. runs the higher net margin — 8374.2% vs -3919.6%, a 12293.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Nakamoto Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-26.3% vs -29.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Nakamoto Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-26.7% CAGR vs -41.8%).
ENvue Medical, Inc. is a medical technology firm specializing in advanced enteral feeding systems and related clinical support solutions. It serves healthcare providers, hospitals and long-term care facilities across North America, focusing on improving safety and efficiency of care for patients requiring enteral nutrition support.
FEED vs NAKA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $312.0K | $444.9K |
| Net Profit | $-12.2M | $37.3M |
| Gross Margin | -118.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -4748.1% | -41198.2% |
| Net Margin | -3919.6% | 8374.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -29.7% | -26.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -754.6% | 3820.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-28.73 | $0.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $312.0K | $444.9K | ||
| Q3 25 | $722.0K | $388.2K | ||
| Q2 25 | $494.0K | $408.5K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0M | $579.7K | ||
| Q4 24 | $444.0K | $603.9K | ||
| Q3 24 | $376.0K | $647.9K | ||
| Q2 24 | $817.0K | $639.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $921.0K | $829.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-12.2M | $37.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $510.0K | $-86.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.0M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.5M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.4M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-998.0K | $-1.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-688.0K | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-588.0K | $-282.3K |
| Q4 25 | -118.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 63.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 72.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -4748.1% | -41198.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -311.2% | -2680.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -804.9% | -585.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -180.7% | -179.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -308.6% | -169.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -258.0% | -162.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -82.5% | -162.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -61.7% | -28.6% |
| Q4 25 | -3919.6% | 8374.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 70.6% | -22162.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -803.8% | -590.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -243.4% | -179.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -322.3% | -165.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -265.4% | -156.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -84.2% | -206.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -63.8% | -34.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-28.73 | $0.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.91 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.03 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.98 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-108.94 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.56 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-27.18 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.38 | $-0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.2M | $22.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.5M | $514.3M |
| Total Assets | $41.1M | $730.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.2M | $22.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.0M | $24.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0M | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $752.0K | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $287.4K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3M | $64.4K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $148.8K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $205.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $254.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $710.0K |
| Q4 25 | $33.5M | $514.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.5M | $477.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.5M | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.7M | $1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $627.0K | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9M | $3.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5M | $-383.1K |
| Q4 25 | $41.1M | $730.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.4M | $692.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.5M | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.1M | $2.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6M | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.7M | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.7M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.2M | $799.3K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.04× | 0.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.06× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.7M | $-23.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -865.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.63× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-9.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.7M | $-23.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.0M | $-13.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $-865.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-548.0K | $-3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-836.0K | $-1.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-553.0K | $-913.5K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-579.0K | $-213.4K |
| Q4 25 | $-2.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-555.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-580.0K | $-224.6K |
| Q4 25 | -865.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -276.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -685.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -131.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -511.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -161.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -67.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -63.0% | -27.1% |
| Q4 25 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.63× | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.86× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
