vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ENvue Medical, Inc. (FEED) and Sintx Technologies, Inc. (SINT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ENvue Medical, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($312.0K vs $290.0K, roughly 1.1× Sintx Technologies, Inc.). Sintx Technologies, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -763.8% vs -3919.6%, a 3155.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ENvue Medical, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-29.7% vs -46.5%). Sintx Technologies, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-2.4M vs $-2.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Sintx Technologies, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-35.0% CAGR vs -41.8%).
ENvue Medical, Inc. is a medical technology firm specializing in advanced enteral feeding systems and related clinical support solutions. It serves healthcare providers, hospitals and long-term care facilities across North America, focusing on improving safety and efficiency of care for patients requiring enteral nutrition support.
Sintx Technologies, Inc. is an advanced materials company specializing in R&D and manufacturing of high-performance silicon nitride and other technical ceramic products. It serves key segments including medical implants, aerospace & defense, industrial wear components, and electric vehicle applications, with core markets across North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific.
FEED vs SINT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $312.0K | $290.0K |
| Net Profit | $-12.2M | $-2.2M |
| Gross Margin | -118.6% | 64.8% |
| Operating Margin | -4748.1% | -799.3% |
| Net Margin | -3919.6% | -763.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -29.7% | -46.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -754.6% | -30.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-28.73 | $-0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $312.0K | $290.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $722.0K | $208.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $494.0K | $151.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0M | $369.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $444.0K | $542.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $376.0K | $799.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $817.0K | $859.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $921.0K | $687.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-12.2M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $510.0K | $-3.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.0M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.5M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.4M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-998.0K | $-6.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-688.0K | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-588.0K | $-886.0K |
| Q4 25 | -118.6% | 64.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.2% | 44.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.1% | 37.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.0% | 33.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 63.7% | 71.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.4% | 73.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.4% | 73.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 72.1% | 67.5% |
| Q4 25 | -4748.1% | -799.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -311.2% | -1613.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -804.9% | -1764.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -180.7% | -645.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -308.6% | -319.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -258.0% | -802.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -82.5% | -315.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -61.7% | -465.4% |
| Q4 25 | -3919.6% | -763.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 70.6% | -1701.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -803.8% | -1535.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -243.4% | -621.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -322.3% | -312.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -265.4% | -780.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -84.2% | -256.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -63.8% | -129.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-28.73 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.91 | $-3.46 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.03 | $-0.91 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.98 | $-1.29 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-108.94 | $17.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.56 | $-6.96 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-27.18 | $-3.61 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.38 | $-21.66 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.2M | $4.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.5M | $2.9M |
| Total Assets | $41.1M | $9.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.2M | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.0M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $752.0K | $3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3M | $4.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $33.5M | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.5M | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.5M | $4.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.7M | $6.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $627.0K | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9M | $5.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5M | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | $41.1M | $9.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.4M | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.5M | $9.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.1M | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6M | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.7M | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.7M | $15.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.2M | $17.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.7M | $-2.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.7M | $-2.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -865.1% | -822.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.4% | 14.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-9.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.7M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.0M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-548.0K | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-836.0K | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-553.0K | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-579.0K | $-2.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.7M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.0M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-555.0K | $-2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-580.0K | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | -865.1% | -822.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -276.7% | -1250.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -685.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -131.5% | -368.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -234.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -323.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -67.9% | -299.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -63.0% | -423.1% |
| Q4 25 | 7.4% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 40.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 26.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 25.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.86× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
