vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of First Foundation Inc. (FFWM) and Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
First Foundation Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($48.4M vs $26.9M, roughly 1.8× Hyperscale Data, Inc.). First Foundation Inc. runs the higher net margin — -97.9% vs -112.0%, a 14.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, First Foundation Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (421.7% vs 38.4%). First Foundation Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-35.2M vs $-56.2M). Over the past eight quarters, First Foundation Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-2.7% CAGR vs -16.3%).
John B. Lacson Colleges Foundation (Bacolod), Inc. is a private maritime college in Bacolod, Negros Occidental, Philippines.
Hyperscale Data, Inc. provides GPU-accelerated computing infrastructure and cloud solutions tailored for AI development, big data processing, and high-performance computing workloads. It primarily serves AI startups, large technology firms, and cloud service providers across North America and the Asia-Pacific region, delivering scalable, high-efficiency computing resources to support complex data processing needs.
FFWM vs GPUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $48.4M | $26.9M |
| Net Profit | $-8.0M | $-30.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 14.5% |
| Operating Margin | -97.5% | -117.8% |
| Net Margin | -97.9% | -112.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 421.7% | 38.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 43.0% | -6670.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.09 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $48.4M | $26.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.6M | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.4M | $25.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.4M | $25.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.3M | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.2M | $31.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.5M | $17.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.1M | $38.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.0M | $-30.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-146.3M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.7M | $-19.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-14.1M | $-445.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-82.2M | $-25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | $-33.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $793.0K | $3.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -21.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 47.4% |
| Q4 25 | -97.5% | -117.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -92.7% | -57.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.1% | -39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | -25.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -247.7% | -46.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1276.7% | -79.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | -151.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.2% | 9.5% |
| Q4 25 | -97.9% | -112.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -230.1% | -53.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.0% | -73.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.7% | -16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -152.2% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -896.9% | -82.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | -190.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 9.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.78 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | $-2.66 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.08 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.24 | $-8.78 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.23 | $-24.82 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.05 | $-37.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $3.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.6B | $13.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $83.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $912.6M | $119.8M |
| Total Assets | $11.9B | $313.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.69× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $13.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $24.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $9.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $18.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $83.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $80.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $88.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $92.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $96.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $104.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $106.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $30.0M |
| Q4 25 | $912.6M | $119.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $917.9M | $55.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $8.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $933.2M | $26.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $928.7M | $59.0M |
| Q4 25 | $11.9B | $313.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.9B | $242.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.6B | $213.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.6B | $218.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.6B | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.4B | $231.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.7B | $270.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.6B | $299.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.19× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.51× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-31.9M | $-37.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-35.2M | $-56.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -72.8% | -208.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | 68.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-45.9M | $-87.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-31.9M | $-37.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.2M | $-17.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.3M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-552.0K | $-4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.7M | $-9.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.2M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.1M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.2M | $-10.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-35.2M | $-56.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.6M | $-20.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.7M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.5M | $-6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.4M | $-9.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.4M | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.4M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.9M | $-11.6M |
| Q4 25 | -72.8% | -208.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.5% | -84.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -32.4% | -13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.5% | -27.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -123.5% | -47.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 146.2% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.3% | -33.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.6% | -30.3% |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 68.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 12.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.5% | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.08× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.96× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.09× | -2.75× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FFWM
Segment breakdown not available.
GPUS
| Transferred Over Time | $10.4M | 39% |
| Revenue From Mined Crypto Assets At Sentinum Owned And Operated Facilities | $5.8M | 21% |
| Hotel And Real Estate Operations | $4.8M | 18% |
| Other | $4.0M | 15% |
| Turn On Green | $2.0M | 7% |
