vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of First Foundation Inc. (FFWM) and Mama's Creations, Inc. (MAMA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
First Foundation Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($48.4M vs $47.3M, roughly 1.0× Mama's Creations, Inc.). Mama's Creations, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 1.1% vs -97.9%, a 99.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, First Foundation Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (421.7% vs 50.0%). Mama's Creations, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($3.7M vs $-35.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Mama's Creations, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (33.0% CAGR vs -2.7%).
John B. Lacson Colleges Foundation (Bacolod), Inc. is a private maritime college in Bacolod, Negros Occidental, Philippines.
Mama's Creations, Inc. is a U.S.-based food manufacturing enterprise that produces a wide portfolio of refrigerated ready-to-eat and heat-and-serve food products, including Italian-style meatballs, sausages, pasta dishes, and other prepared meals. It mainly distributes its offerings to grocery retailers, mass merchandisers and foodservice partners across the United States, focusing on convenient, high-quality comfort food for daily consumer demand.
FFWM vs MAMA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $48.4M | $47.3M |
| Net Profit | $-8.0M | $540.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 23.6% |
| Operating Margin | -97.5% | 1.7% |
| Net Margin | -97.9% | 1.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 421.7% | 50.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 43.0% | 31.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.09 | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $48.4M | $47.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.6M | $35.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.4M | $35.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.4M | $33.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.3M | $31.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.2M | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.5M | $29.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.1M | $26.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.0M | $540.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-146.3M | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.7M | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9M | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-14.1M | $410.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-82.2M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | $553.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $793.0K | $1.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 26.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 29.3% |
| Q4 25 | -97.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -92.7% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.1% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -247.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1276.7% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.2% | 7.4% |
| Q4 25 | -97.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -230.1% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.0% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.7% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -152.2% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -896.9% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.09 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.78 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.08 | $0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.24 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.23 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.05 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.6B | $18.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $912.6M | $49.6M |
| Total Assets | $11.9B | $84.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $18.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $7.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $9.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $7.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $13.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $11.0M |
| Q4 25 | $912.6M | $49.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $917.9M | $29.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $26.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $24.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $22.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $933.2M | $20.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $928.7M | $19.6M |
| Q4 25 | $11.9B | $84.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.9B | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.6B | $52.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.6B | $47.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.6B | $47.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.4B | $43.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.7B | $47.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.6B | $45.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-31.9M | $3.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-35.2M | $3.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -72.8% | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 7.16× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-45.9M | $6.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-31.9M | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.2M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.3M | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-552.0K | $-857.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.7M | $4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.2M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.1M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.2M | $6.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-35.2M | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.6M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.7M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.5M | $-930.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.4M | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.4M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.4M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.9M | $6.6M |
| Q4 25 | -72.8% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.5% | -6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -32.4% | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.5% | -2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -123.5% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 146.2% | -14.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.3% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.6% | 24.8% |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.4% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.5% | 0.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.16× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.85× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.08× | -0.54× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.71× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -2.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.96× | 6.58× | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.09× | 4.79× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
