vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. (FG) and Gen Digital (GEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.4× Gen Digital). Gen Digital runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs 7.3%, a 8.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gen Digital posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.5% vs 13.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Gen Digital's revenue compounded faster (13.2% CAGR vs 6.1%).
F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. is a public company headquartered in Des Moines, Iowa. It primarily provides annuities, life insurance, and pension buyout services. The company was founded in 1959.
Gen Digital Inc. is a multinational software company co-headquartered in both Tempe, Arizona (USA) and Prague, Czech Republic (EU). The company provides cybersecurity software, financial technology, and services. Gen is a Fortune 500 company and a member of the S&P 500 stock-market index. It is listed at both NASDAQ and Prague Stock Exchange. Its portfolio includes Norton, Avast, LifeLock, Avira, AVG, ReputationDefender, MoneyLion and CCleaner.
FG vs GEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $128.0M | $192.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 78.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 34.9% |
| Net Margin | 7.3% | 15.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.2% | 28.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -60.9% | 6.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.97 | $0.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $908.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $986.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $974.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $965.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $192.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $128.0M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.0M | $135.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $142.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $327.0M | $159.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.0M | $161.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $203.0M | $181.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 78.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 78.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 78.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 80.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 80.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 80.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 80.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 35.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 35.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 37.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.3% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.0% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.3% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.4% | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.3% | 18.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.31 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.97 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.85 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.26 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.53 | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.08 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.55 | $0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.5B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.2B | $8.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.8B | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $98.4B | $15.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.47× | 3.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $883.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.5B | $737.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $644.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | $8.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $8.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.8B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.7B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $15.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $98.4B | $16.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.1B | $16.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.0B | $15.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.0B | $15.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.1B | $15.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.5B | $15.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.61× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.47× | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.46× | 3.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.51× | 3.64× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.55× | 3.94× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.47× | 4.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.56× | 4.33× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.2B | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 9.13× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $541.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $937.0M | $409.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $956.0M | $473.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $326.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $158.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $264.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $535.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $405.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $470.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $318.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $156.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $262.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 43.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 27.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.13× | 4.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.94× | 3.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.50× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.04× | 2.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.20× | 1.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FG
Segment breakdown not available.
GEN
| Cyber Safety Platform | $819.0M | 66% |
| Trust Based Solutions | $421.0M | 34% |
| Net Interest Income On Notes Receivable | $4.0M | 0% |
