vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. (FIGR) and Life360, Inc. (LIF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($156.4M vs $146.0M, roughly 1.1× Life360, Inc.). Life360, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 88.8% vs 57.3%, a 31.5% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. is a financial technology company in Reno, Nevada, United States. Established in 2018, it develops and operates blockchain-based platforms used in lending, capital markets, and asset management.
Life360, Inc. develops family-focused safety and connectivity platforms. Core offerings include real-time location sharing, emergency alerts, driving behavior analysis tools and identity theft protection. It serves consumer markets across North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific, with most revenue from tiered premium subscription plans.
FIGR vs LIF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $156.4M | $146.0M |
| Net Profit | $89.6M | $129.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 75.1% |
| Operating Margin | 33.7% | 6.1% |
| Net Margin | 57.3% | 88.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 26.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 1425.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.34 | $1.53 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $146.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $156.4M | $124.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $115.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $103.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $115.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $92.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $84.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $78.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $129.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.6M | $9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-11.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-9.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 75.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 78.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 78.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 80.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 74.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 75.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 75.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 76.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.7% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -8.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 88.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.3% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -12.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -12.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.53 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.34 | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.15 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.1B | $494.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $466.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $548.2M |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $959.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.40× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $494.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $455.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $432.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $168.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $159.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $159.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $160.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $73.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $466.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $548.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $391.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $366.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $376.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $358.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $339.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $326.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $239.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $959.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $787.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $753.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $455.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $441.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $427.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $405.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $318.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.02× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $49.3M | $36.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $36.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 25.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.55× | 0.28× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $86.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $36.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.3M | $26.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $13.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $36.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $25.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $12.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 25.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.55× | 2.70× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.90× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.45× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.83× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
