vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. (FIGR) and OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC (OXM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($307.3M vs $156.4M, roughly 2.0× Figure Technology Solutions, Inc.). Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 57.3% vs -20.7%, a 78.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. is a financial technology company in Reno, Nevada, United States. Established in 2018, it develops and operates blockchain-based platforms used in lending, capital markets, and asset management.
Oxford Industries, Inc. is a publicly traded clothing company in the United States that specializes in high-end clothing and apparel. The company carries many major labels, including Tommy Bahama, Lilly Pulitzer, Johnny Was and Southern Tide.
FIGR vs OXM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $156.4M | $307.3M |
| Net Profit | $89.6M | $-63.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 60.3% |
| Operating Margin | 33.7% | -27.7% |
| Net Margin | 57.3% | -20.7% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -0.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -1517.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.34 | $-4.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $307.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $156.4M | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $392.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $308.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $419.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $398.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $404.4M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $326.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-63.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.6M | $16.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $26.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $40.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $38.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-60.1M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $10.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 60.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 61.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 64.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 63.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 63.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 64.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 60.9% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 62.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | -27.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.7% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -20.1% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 4.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | -20.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.3% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -14.9% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 3.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-4.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.34 | $1.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.70 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.57 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.72 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $0.68 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.1B | $8.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $466.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $528.0M |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.40× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $18.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $7.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $466.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $29.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $528.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $597.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $592.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $612.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $621.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $592.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $560.9M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $627.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $49.3M | $-9.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-47.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -15.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 12.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.55× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-79.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-9.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.3M | $83.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-18.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $88.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $32.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $74.9M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $16.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-47.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $52.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-27.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-56.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $21.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $55.3M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-6.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | -15.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -7.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -18.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -1.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 7.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.55× | 5.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.15× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 1.57× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FIGR
Segment breakdown not available.
OXM
| Sales Channel Retail | $162.9M | 53% |
| Sales Channel Wholesale | $61.3M | 20% |
| Johnny Was | $45.4M | 15% |
| Sales Channel Food And Beverage | $29.3M | 10% |
| Other Foreign Countries | $9.0M | 3% |
