vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FIGS, Inc. (FIGS) and Global-E Online Ltd. (GLBE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Global-E Online Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($625.5M vs $201.9M, roughly 3.1× FIGS, Inc.). FIGS, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 9.2% vs 0.9%, a 8.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Figs is an American clothing company based in Santa Monica, California. The company sells scrubs and other products for healthcare professionals. It was founded in 2013 by Heather Hasson and Trina Spear, who are co-CEOs.
Global-E Online Ltd. operates a leading cross-border e-commerce enablement platform that helps direct-to-consumer brands and retail enterprises expand their international sales reach. It offers end-to-end services including localized checkout, payment processing, customs clearance, logistics coordination, and duty calculation, serving clients across North America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region.
FIGS vs GLBE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $201.9M | $625.5M |
| Net Profit | $18.5M | $5.8M |
| Gross Margin | 62.9% | 45.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 1.3% |
| Net Margin | 9.2% | 0.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 33.0% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 881.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.10 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $201.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.7M | $625.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.6M | $404.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $124.9M | $189.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $140.2M | $489.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $144.2M | $313.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $119.3M | $145.9M |
| Q4 25 | $18.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.7M | $5.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-102.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.7M | $-77.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1M | $-54.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | 62.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 69.9% | 45.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 67.0% | 44.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 67.6% | 44.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 67.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 67.1% | 45.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 67.4% | 44.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 68.9% | 43.4% |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.5% | -2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.2% | -10.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.2% | -14.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | -16.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | -20.1% |
| Q4 25 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.7% | -1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.2% | -15.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | -17.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $82.0M | $251.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $437.5M | $933.0M |
| Total Assets | $580.0M | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $82.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.5M | $251.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.8M | $205.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $90.0M | $207.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $124.1M | $207.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $131.8M | $229.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $155.3M | $181.9M |
| Q4 25 | $437.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $413.3M | $933.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $396.5M | $909.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $381.5M | $884.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $377.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $403.5M | $869.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $401.7M | $878.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $389.9M | $886.9M |
| Q4 25 | $580.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $544.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $517.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $522.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $509.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $542.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $526.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $510.9M | $1.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $60.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $58.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 28.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.29× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $53.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $60.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $58.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $531.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 28.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.29× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.75× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.14× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.04× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.10× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FIGS
| Scrubwear | $154.9M | 77% |
| Non Scrubwear Lifestyle | $47.0M | 23% |
GLBE
Segment breakdown not available.
