vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FIGS, Inc. (FIGS) and Navios Maritime Partners L.P. (NMM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($327.6M vs $201.9M, roughly 1.6× FIGS, Inc.). Navios Maritime Partners L.P. runs the higher net margin — 21.4% vs 9.2%, a 12.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FIGS, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (33.0% vs -4.3%).
Figs is an American clothing company based in Santa Monica, California. The company sells scrubs and other products for healthcare professionals. It was founded in 2013 by Heather Hasson and Trina Spear, who are co-CEOs.
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. is a multinational, vertically integrated seaborne shipping and logistics company focused on the transport and transshipment of drybulk commodities including iron ore, coal and grain.
FIGS vs NMM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $201.9M | $327.6M |
| Net Profit | $18.5M | $69.9M |
| Gross Margin | 62.9% | 90.5% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 9.2% | 21.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 33.0% | -4.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 881.8% | -31.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.10 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $201.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.6M | $327.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $124.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $140.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $144.2M | $342.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $119.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $18.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1M | $69.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-102.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1M | $101.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | 62.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 69.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 67.0% | 90.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 67.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 67.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 67.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 67.4% | 88.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 68.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.7% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 29.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $82.0M | $377.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $437.5M | — |
| Total Assets | $580.0M | $5.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $82.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.8M | $377.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $90.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $124.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $131.8M | $272.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $155.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $437.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $413.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $396.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $381.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $377.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $403.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $401.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $389.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $580.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $544.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $517.1M | $5.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $522.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $509.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $542.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $526.0M | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $510.9M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $60.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $58.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 28.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.29× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $53.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $60.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $58.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $531.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 28.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.29× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.75× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.14× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.04× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.10× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FIGS
| Scrubwear | $154.9M | 77% |
| Non Scrubwear Lifestyle | $47.0M | 23% |
NMM
Segment breakdown not available.
