vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FinVolution Group (FINV) and MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP (MATW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FinVolution Group is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($479.7M vs $284.8M, roughly 1.7× MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP). FinVolution Group runs the higher net margin — 21.2% vs 15.3%, a 5.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. FinVolution Group produced more free cash flow last quarter ($70.6M vs $-57.2M).
Volution Group plc is a manufacturer of ventilation equipment for commercial and residential customers. Based in Crawley, West Sussex, the company is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index.
Matthews Aurora Funeral Solutions is one of the largest manufacturers of caskets and funerary urns in the United States, selling over 38% of the country's caskets as of 2005. The Aurora, Indiana–based company is a subsidiary of Pittsburgh-based Matthews International. The company makes both wooden and metal caskets and urns for holding cremated remains. It also provides supplies and consulting services for funeral homes.
FINV vs MATW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $479.7M | $284.8M |
| Net Profit | $101.7M | $43.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.0% |
| Operating Margin | 44.6% | 34.2% |
| Net Margin | 21.2% | 15.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -29.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 1356.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $745.0M | $31.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $529.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $543.2M |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.98× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $31.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $745.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $529.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $543.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $72.0M | $-52.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $70.6M | $-57.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 14.7% | -20.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.71× | -1.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-52.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-57.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -20.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.71× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
