vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FLOWERS FOODS INC (FLO) and Teradyne (TER). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FLOWERS FOODS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.1× Teradyne). On growth, Teradyne posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (43.9% vs -75.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Teradyne's revenue compounded faster (34.4% CAGR vs -11.6%).
Flowers Foods, headquartered in Thomasville, Georgia, is a producer and marketer of packaged bakery foods in the United States. The company operates 44 bakeries across 19 states that produce a variety of products, including bread, buns, rolls, snack cakes, pastries, and tortillas. As of February 2013, Flowers Foods had grown to be the "second-largest baking company in the United States."
Teradyne, Inc. is an American automatic test equipment (ATE) designer and manufacturer based in North Reading, Massachusetts. Its high-profile customers include Samsung, Qualcomm, Intel, Analog Devices, Texas Instruments and IBM.
FLO vs TER — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | — | $257.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 57.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | 27.1% |
| Net Margin | — | 23.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -75.8% | 43.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 75.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $769.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $651.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $685.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $752.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $737.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $729.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $599.8M |
| Q4 25 | $39.5M | $257.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $58.4M | $119.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.0M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $98.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.0M | $146.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.0M | $145.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.0M | $186.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $64.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 57.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 58.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 57.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 60.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 59.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 59.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 58.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 56.6% |
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | 27.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.5% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.6% | 20.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.8% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.4% | 28.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 13.0% |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | 12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 19.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.5% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.19 | $1.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.28 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.25 | $0.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.61 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.31 | $0.89 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.32 | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.34 | $1.14 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $12.1M | $293.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $2.8B |
| Total Assets | $4.2B | $4.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $16.7M | $293.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.0M | $272.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.3M | $339.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $475.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.0M | $553.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.9M | $510.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.8M | $421.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $707.4M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.3B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.3B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.4B |
| Q4 25 | 1.25× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.23× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.26× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.77× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.76× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $125.4M | $281.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $218.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 20.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.09× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $450.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $54.4M | $281.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $130.8M | $49.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $135.6M | $182.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $161.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $113.9M | $282.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.3M | $166.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $105.1M | $216.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.3M |
| Q4 25 | $30.4M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $100.0M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $110.1M | $131.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $97.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $88.6M | $225.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.4M | $114.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $71.8M | $171.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-36.7M |
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.1% | 20.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.4% | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.9% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | 23.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -6.1% |
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.38× | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.24× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.56× | 2.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.75× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.94× | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.44× | 1.16× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.11× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FLO
Segment breakdown not available.
TER
| Soc | $646.5M | 60% |
| Memory | $206.5M | 19% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $90.0M | 8% |
| Universal Robots | $89.4M | 8% |
| IST | $30.5M | 3% |
| Transferred Over Time | $20.5M | 2% |