vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of FLOWSERVE CORP (FLS) and Roper Technologies (ROP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Roper Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $1.1B, roughly 2.0× FLOWSERVE CORP). Roper Technologies runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs 7.6%, a 8.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Roper Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs -6.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Roper Technologies's revenue compounded faster (10.5% CAGR vs -3.9%).

The Flowserve Corporation is an American multinational corporation and one of the largest suppliers of industrial and environmental machinery such as pumps, valves, end face mechanical seals, automation, and services to the power, oil, gas, chemical and other industries. Headquartered in Irving, Texas, which is in the Dallas–Fort Worth Metroplex, Flowserve employs close to 16,000 employees in more than 50 countries. Flowserve sells products and offers aftermarket services to engineering and c...

FLS vs ROP — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
ROP
ROP
2.0× larger
ROP
$2.1B
$1.1B
FLS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
ROP
ROP
+18.0% gap
ROP
11.3%
-6.7%
FLS
Higher net margin
ROP
ROP
8.2% more per $
ROP
15.8%
7.6%
FLS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
ROP
ROP
Annualised
ROP
10.5%
-3.9%
FLS

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
FLS
FLS
ROP
ROP
Revenue
$1.1B
$2.1B
Net Profit
$81.7M
$331.0M
Gross Margin
35.6%
69.4%
Operating Margin
11.2%
27.2%
Net Margin
7.6%
15.8%
Revenue YoY
-6.7%
11.3%
Net Profit YoY
10.5%
53.7%
EPS (diluted)
$4.87

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FLS
FLS
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
$1.1B
$2.1B
Q4 25
$1.2B
$2.1B
Q3 25
$1.2B
$2.0B
Q2 25
$1.2B
$1.9B
Q1 25
$1.1B
$1.9B
Q4 24
$1.2B
$1.9B
Q3 24
$1.1B
$1.8B
Q2 24
$1.2B
$1.7B
Net Profit
FLS
FLS
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
$81.7M
$331.0M
Q4 25
$-29.0M
$428.4M
Q3 25
$219.6M
$398.5M
Q2 25
$81.8M
$378.3M
Q1 25
$73.9M
$331.1M
Q4 24
$77.5M
$462.3M
Q3 24
$58.4M
$367.9M
Q2 24
$72.6M
$337.1M
Gross Margin
FLS
FLS
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
35.6%
69.4%
Q4 25
34.8%
69.5%
Q3 25
32.4%
69.5%
Q2 25
34.2%
69.2%
Q1 25
32.3%
68.7%
Q4 24
31.5%
68.3%
Q3 24
31.5%
69.2%
Q2 24
31.6%
69.5%
Operating Margin
FLS
FLS
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
11.2%
27.2%
Q4 25
3.5%
28.6%
Q3 25
6.7%
28.4%
Q2 25
12.3%
28.2%
Q1 25
11.5%
27.9%
Q4 24
10.6%
28.0%
Q3 24
9.1%
28.1%
Q2 24
10.5%
28.8%
Net Margin
FLS
FLS
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
7.6%
15.8%
Q4 25
-2.4%
20.8%
Q3 25
18.7%
19.8%
Q2 25
6.9%
19.5%
Q1 25
6.5%
17.6%
Q4 24
6.6%
24.6%
Q3 24
5.2%
20.8%
Q2 24
6.3%
19.6%
EPS (diluted)
FLS
FLS
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
$4.87
Q4 25
$-0.21
$3.97
Q3 25
$1.67
$3.68
Q2 25
$0.62
$3.49
Q1 25
$0.56
$3.06
Q4 24
$0.59
$4.29
Q3 24
$0.44
$3.40
Q2 24
$0.55
$3.12

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FLS
FLS
ROP
ROP
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$792.4M
$382.9M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$9.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$2.3B
$18.8B
Total Assets
$5.7B
$34.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.52×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FLS
FLS
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
$792.4M
$382.9M
Q4 25
$760.2M
$297.4M
Q3 25
$320.0M
Q2 25
$242.4M
Q1 25
$372.8M
Q4 24
$675.4M
$188.2M
Q3 24
$269.6M
Q2 24
$251.5M
Total Debt
FLS
FLS
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
$9.7B
Q4 25
$1.6B
$9.3B
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$1.5B
$7.6B
Q3 24
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
FLS
FLS
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
$2.3B
$18.8B
Q4 25
$2.2B
$19.9B
Q3 25
$2.3B
$20.0B
Q2 25
$2.2B
$19.6B
Q1 25
$2.1B
$19.2B
Q4 24
$2.0B
$18.9B
Q3 24
$2.1B
$18.5B
Q2 24
$2.0B
$18.1B
Total Assets
FLS
FLS
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
$5.7B
$34.6B
Q4 25
$5.7B
$34.6B
Q3 25
$5.8B
$34.6B
Q2 25
$5.7B
$33.2B
Q1 25
$5.5B
$31.4B
Q4 24
$5.5B
$31.3B
Q3 24
$5.3B
$31.6B
Q2 24
$5.2B
$29.8B
Debt / Equity
FLS
FLS
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
0.52×
Q4 25
0.72×
0.47×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.75×
0.40×
Q3 24
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FLS
FLS
ROP
ROP
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$507.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
24.2%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.5%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FLS
FLS
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-174.0K
$738.0M
Q3 25
$401.8M
$869.5M
Q2 25
$154.1M
$404.1M
Q1 25
$-49.9M
$528.7M
Q4 24
$197.3M
$722.2M
Q3 24
$178.5M
$755.4M
Q2 24
$-12.8M
$384.1M
Free Cash Flow
FLS
FLS
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
$507.0M
Q4 25
$-25.6M
Q3 25
$384.7M
Q2 25
$137.5M
Q1 25
$-61.7M
Q4 24
$168.5M
Q3 24
$154.6M
Q2 24
$-27.5M
FCF Margin
FLS
FLS
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
24.2%
Q4 25
-2.1%
Q3 25
32.8%
Q2 25
11.6%
Q1 25
-5.4%
Q4 24
14.3%
Q3 24
13.6%
Q2 24
-2.4%
Capex Intensity
FLS
FLS
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
0.5%
Q4 25
2.1%
Q3 25
1.5%
Q2 25
1.4%
Q1 25
1.0%
Q4 24
2.4%
Q3 24
2.1%
Q2 24
1.3%
Cash Conversion
FLS
FLS
ROP
ROP
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.72×
Q3 25
1.83×
2.18×
Q2 25
1.89×
1.07×
Q1 25
-0.68×
1.60×
Q4 24
2.55×
1.56×
Q3 24
3.06×
2.05×
Q2 24
-0.18×
1.14×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons