vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FARMERS NATIONAL BANC CORP (FMNB) and IMAX CORP (IMAX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IMAX CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($125.2M vs $71.5M, roughly 1.8× FARMERS NATIONAL BANC CORP). FARMERS NATIONAL BANC CORP runs the higher net margin — 20.5% vs 0.5%, a 20.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, IMAX CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.1% vs 3.2%). FARMERS NATIONAL BANC CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($52.2M vs $28.0M). Over the past eight quarters, IMAX CORP's revenue compounded faster (25.8% CAGR vs 6.2%).
Farmers National Banc Corp (OH) is a regional financial holding company based in Ohio, the United States. It offers full-spectrum retail and commercial banking products, wealth management solutions, and insurance services, primarily catering to individual consumers, small and medium-sized enterprises, and local community clients in Ohio and adjacent Midwestern U.S. regions.
IMAX Corporation is a Canadian production theatre company which designs and manufactures IMAX cameras and projection systems as well as performing film development, production, post-production and distribution to IMAX-affiliated theatres worldwide. Founded in Montreal in 1967, it has headquarters in the Toronto area, and operations in New York City and Los Angeles.
FMNB vs IMAX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $71.5M | $125.2M |
| Net Profit | $14.6M | $637.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 57.6% |
| Operating Margin | 24.8% | 19.3% |
| Net Margin | 20.5% | 0.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.2% | 35.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1.7% | -88.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.39 | $0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $71.5M | $125.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $70.8M | $106.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $69.8M | $91.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $67.8M | $86.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $69.3M | $92.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $70.3M | $91.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.5M | $89.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.4M | $79.1M |
| Q4 25 | $14.6M | $637.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.5M | $20.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.9M | $11.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.6M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.4M | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5M | $13.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.2M | $3.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 57.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 63.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 58.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 61.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 52.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 55.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 49.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 59.3% |
| Q4 25 | 24.8% | 19.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | 27.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.4% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.1% | 19.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.5% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.3% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.2% | 15.3% |
| Q4 25 | 20.5% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.6% | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.9% | 12.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.8% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.1% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.7% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.7% | 4.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.39 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.33 | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.37 | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.36 | $0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.38 | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.23 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.31 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.30 | $0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $151.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $86.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $485.7M | $337.9M |
| Total Assets | $5.2B | $894.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.18× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $151.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $143.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $109.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $97.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $100.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $104.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $91.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $81.0M |
| Q4 25 | $86.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $86.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $86.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $88.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $485.7M | $337.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $465.9M | $349.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $437.7M | $320.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $429.1M | $299.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $406.0M | $299.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $439.7M | $289.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $396.7M | $267.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $397.0M | $258.8M |
| Q4 25 | $5.2B | $894.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2B | $889.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | $868.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $848.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | $830.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $847.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2B | $827.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.1B | $824.1M |
| Q4 25 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.19× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.22× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $60.0M | $29.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $52.2M | $28.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 73.0% | 22.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 11.0% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.10× | 46.11× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $85.8M | $118.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $60.0M | $29.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.7M | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.0M | $23.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.7M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $66.6M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.9M | $35.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.6M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.7M | $-11.0M |
| Q4 25 | $52.2M | $28.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0M | $64.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.4M | $20.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.2M | $5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.9M | $6.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.4M | $34.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.4M | $33.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.2M | $-12.1M |
| Q4 25 | 73.0% | 22.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.8% | 60.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.8% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.0% | 6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 79.2% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.1% | 37.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.6% | 37.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.2% | -15.3% |
| Q4 25 | 11.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.9% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.4% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 4.10× | 46.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.86× | 3.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.01× | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.15× | 2.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.63× | 2.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.80× | 2.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.41× | 9.78× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.22× | -3.35× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FMNB
Segment breakdown not available.
IMAX
| Technology Sales | $46.6M | 37% |
| Image Enhancement And Maintenance Services | $38.1M | 30% |
| Joint Revenue Sharing Arrangement | $20.4M | 16% |
| Maintenance | $16.3M | 13% |
| Finance Income | $2.8M | 2% |
| Other Content Solutions | $1.6M | 1% |
