vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Fabrinet (FN) and CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Fabrinet is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.0× CHART INDUSTRIES INC). Fabrinet runs the higher net margin — 9.9% vs 5.0%, a 5.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fabrinet posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.9% vs -2.5%). CHART INDUSTRIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($66.2M vs $-5.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Fabrinet's revenue compounded faster (24.4% CAGR vs 6.6%).
FabrinetFNEarnings & Financial Report
Below is a list of companies having stocks that are included in the S&P MidCap 400 stock market index. The index, maintained by S&P Dow Jones Indices, comprises the common stocks of 400 mid-cap, mostly American, companies. Although called the S&P 400, the index sometimes contains more than 400 stocks when it includes two or more share classes of stock from one of its component companies.
Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.
FN vs GTLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $112.6M | $53.6M |
| Gross Margin | 12.2% | 33.3% |
| Operating Margin | 10.1% | 11.6% |
| Net Margin | 9.9% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 35.9% | -2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.0% | -32.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.11 | $1.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $978.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $909.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $871.8M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $833.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $804.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $753.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $731.5M | $950.7M |
| Q4 25 | $112.6M | $53.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.9M | $-138.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.2M | $76.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.3M | $49.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $86.6M | $79.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.4M | $69.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $81.1M | $58.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $80.9M | $11.3M |
| Q4 25 | 12.2% | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.9% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.2% | 33.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.7% | 33.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.1% | 33.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.3% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.3% | 33.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | 31.8% |
| Q4 25 | 10.1% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.6% | -8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.8% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 16.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.7% | 11.9% |
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.8% | -12.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.6% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.8% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.1% | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | $3.11 | $1.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.66 | $-3.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.41 | $1.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.25 | $0.94 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.38 | $1.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.13 | $1.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.22 | $1.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.21 | $0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $960.8M | $366.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $3.2B |
| Total Assets | $3.3B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.13× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $960.8M | $366.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $968.8M | $399.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $934.2M | $342.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $950.7M | $296.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $934.6M | $308.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $908.9M | $310.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $858.6M | $247.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $794.0M | $191.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $2.7B |
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $9.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $9.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $9.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $9.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $46.3M | $88.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-5.3M | $66.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.5% | 6.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.6% | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.41× | 1.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $102.3M | $202.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $46.3M | $88.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $102.6M | $118.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.1M | $145.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.2M | $-60.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.9M | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.2M | $200.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.1M | $116.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $100.9M | $-95.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-5.3M | $66.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.3M | $94.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | $122.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.7M | $-80.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.0M | $260.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.9M | $174.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.4M | $88.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $87.3M | $-141.2M |
| Q4 25 | -0.5% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.2% | -8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.3% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.8% | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.3% | 8.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.9% | -14.9% |
| Q4 25 | 4.6% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.5% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.9% | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.41× | 1.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.63× | 1.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.91× | -1.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.34× | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.07× | 2.91× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.02× | 1.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.25× | -8.42× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FN
| Optical Communications | $832.6M | 73% |
| Non Optical Communications | $300.3M | 27% |
GTLS
| Repair Service And Leasing Segment | $330.4M | 31% |
| Heat Transfer Systems Segment | $325.8M | 30% |
| Specialty Products Segment | $259.5M | 24% |
| Transferred Over Time | $94.4M | 9% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $69.5M | 6% |
