vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Fabrinet (FN) and Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Fabrinet is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $985.0M, roughly 1.2× Garrett Motion Inc.). Fabrinet runs the higher net margin — 9.9% vs 9.6%, a 0.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fabrinet posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.9% vs 12.2%). Garrett Motion Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($49.0M vs $-5.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Fabrinet's revenue compounded faster (24.4% CAGR vs 5.2%).
FabrinetFNEarnings & Financial Report
Below is a list of companies having stocks that are included in the S&P MidCap 400 stock market index. The index, maintained by S&P Dow Jones Indices, comprises the common stocks of 400 mid-cap, mostly American, companies. Although called the S&P 400, the index sometimes contains more than 400 stocks when it includes two or more share classes of stock from one of its component companies.
Garrett Motion Inc., formerly Honeywell Transportation Systems and Honeywell Turbo Technologies, is an American company primarily involved in engineering, development and manufacturing of turbochargers and related forced induction systems for ground vehicles from small passenger cars to large trucks and industrial equipment and construction machinery. It originated as part of Garrett AiResearch's Industrial Division in Phoenix, Arizona, in 1954, after which they entered a contract to provide ...
FN vs GTX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $985.0M |
| Net Profit | $112.6M | $95.0M |
| Gross Margin | 12.2% | 19.9% |
| Operating Margin | 10.1% | — |
| Net Margin | 9.9% | 9.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 35.9% | 12.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.0% | 53.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.11 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $985.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $891.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $978.1M | $902.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $909.7M | $913.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $871.8M | $878.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $833.6M | $844.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $804.2M | $826.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $753.3M | $890.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $95.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $112.6M | $84.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.9M | $77.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.2M | $87.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.3M | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $86.6M | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.4M | $52.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $81.1M | $64.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.2% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.9% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.2% | 19.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.7% | 20.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.1% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.3% | 20.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.3% | 20.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.1% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.6% | 11.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.8% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 9.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.8% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.6% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | 7.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.8% | 7.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.11 | $0.42 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.66 | $0.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.41 | $0.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.25 | $0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.38 | $0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.13 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.22 | $0.28 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $960.8M | $142.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | — |
| Total Assets | $3.3B | $2.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $142.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $960.8M | $177.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $968.8M | $230.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $934.2M | $232.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $950.7M | $130.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $934.6M | $125.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $908.9M | $96.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $858.6M | $98.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $-802.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $-813.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $-812.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $-700.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $-673.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $-778.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $-725.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $2.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $46.3M | $98.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-5.3M | $49.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.5% | 5.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.41× | 1.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $102.3M | $360.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $98.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $46.3M | $99.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $102.6M | $100.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.1M | $158.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.2M | $56.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.9M | $131.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.2M | $67.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.1M | $126.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $49.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-5.3M | $78.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.3M | $90.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | $143.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.7M | $30.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.0M | $109.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.9M | $47.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.4M | $109.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.5% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.2% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.3% | 12.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.8% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.3% | 12.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.6% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.5% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.41× | 1.18× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.07× | 1.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.63× | 1.82× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.91× | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.34× | 1.31× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.07× | 1.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.02× | 1.97× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FN
| Optical Communications | $832.6M | 73% |
| Non Optical Communications | $300.3M | 27% |
GTX
Segment breakdown not available.
