vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) and Roper Technologies (ROP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Roper Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.8× Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.). Roper Technologies runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs 3.4%, a 12.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Roper Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs -0.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Roper Technologies's revenue compounded faster (10.5% CAGR vs 0.8%).
Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc., branded as Floor & Decor, is a multi-channel American specialty retailer of hard surface flooring and related accessories that was founded in 2000 and headquartered in Smyrna, Georgia, United States.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
FND vs ROP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $39.7M | $331.0M |
| Gross Margin | 44.0% | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | 27.2% |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | 15.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.7% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -18.8% | 53.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.37 | $4.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | $39.7M | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $39.3M | $428.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.3M | $398.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.2M | $378.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.9M | $331.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.5M | $462.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.7M | $367.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.7M | $337.1M |
| Q1 26 | 44.0% | 69.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.5% | 69.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.4% | 69.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.9% | 69.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.8% | 68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.5% | 68.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.5% | 69.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.3% | 69.5% |
| Q1 26 | 4.5% | 27.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.6% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.7% | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | 27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.9% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.3% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | 3.4% | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.2% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.0% | 19.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.37 | $4.87 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.36 | $3.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.53 | $3.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.58 | $3.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.45 | $3.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.44 | $4.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.48 | $3.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.52 | $3.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $293.6M | $382.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $9.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.5B | $18.8B |
| Total Assets | $5.6B | $34.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $293.6M | $382.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $297.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $320.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $242.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $372.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $188.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $269.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $251.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.5B | $18.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $19.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $20.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $19.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | $19.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $18.1B |
| Q1 26 | $5.6B | $34.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.5B | $34.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5B | $34.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $33.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4B | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | $31.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9B | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | $29.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $109.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $507.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 24.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.75× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $109.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $124.1M | $738.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $102.5M | $869.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.1M | $404.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.2M | $528.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.4M | $722.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $160.3M | $755.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $194.0M | $384.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $507.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $45.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $36.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.75× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.15× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.79× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.33× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.46× | 1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.10× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.42× | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
