vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of First Northwest Bancorp (FNWB) and EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. (MRAM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
First Northwest Bancorp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($18.4M vs $14.9M, roughly 1.2× EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC.). First Northwest Bancorp runs the higher net margin — 2.6% vs -2.0%, a 4.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, First Northwest Bancorp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.1% vs 13.2%). Over the past eight quarters, EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC.'s revenue compounded faster (18.2% CAGR vs 6.8%).
First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. was headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, just east of O'Hare Airport. The company's predecessor traces back to Joliet, Illinois. From there the company has grown to serve many Chicago suburbs including northwest Indiana, downstate Illinois, southeast Wisconsin and the Quad Cities area including Iowa. First Midwest Bank is one of the largest banking institutions in the United States
Everspin Technologies, Inc. is a publicly traded semiconductor company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona, United States. It develops and manufactures discrete magnetoresistive RAM or magnetoresistive random-access memory (MRAM) products, including Toggle MRAM and Spin-Transfer Torque MRAM (STT-MRAM) product families. It also licenses its technology for use in embedded MRAM (eMRAM) applications, magnetic sensor applications as well as performs backend foundry services for eMRAM.
FNWB vs MRAM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.4M | $14.9M |
| Net Profit | $382.0K | $-296.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 52.7% |
| Operating Margin | 6.2% | 29.0% |
| Net Margin | 2.6% | -2.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 19.1% | 13.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 113.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.04 | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $14.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.4M | $14.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.6M | $14.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.4M | $13.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.6M | $13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.8M | $12.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6M | $10.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-296.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | $382.0K | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $802.0K | $54.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7M | $-670.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.0M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.8M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.2M | $-2.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 52.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 50.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 51.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 49.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 49.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 29.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.2% | -7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | -11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.2% | -14.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -57.7% | -14.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.3% | -11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -20.1% | -17.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.8% | -26.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.8% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.4% | -5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -51.3% | -8.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -19.9% | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.5% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.3% | -23.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.04 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.09 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.42 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.03 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.31 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.23 | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.25 | $-0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $40.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $157.3M | $70.2M |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $83.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $40.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $44.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $45.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $45.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $42.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $39.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $36.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $70.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $157.3M | $68.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $154.5M | $65.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $149.7M | $64.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $146.5M | $63.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $153.9M | $62.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $160.8M | $59.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $158.9M | $55.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $83.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $84.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $80.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $78.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | $80.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $77.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $72.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $64.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.8M | $570.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -7.22× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $570.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $881.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0M | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.7M | $1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.9M | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2M | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.1M | $1.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-975.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $543.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $527.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 22.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -7.22× | 2.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.89× | 16.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.08× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.25× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FNWB
Segment breakdown not available.
MRAM
| Product sales | $14.1M | 95% |
| Licensing, royalty, patent, engineering services and other revenue | $772.0K | 5% |
