vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Forestar Group Inc. (FOR) and Enpro Inc. (NPO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Enpro Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($295.4M vs $273.0M, roughly 1.1× Forestar Group Inc.). Forestar Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.6% vs -10.8%, a 16.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Enpro Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.3% vs 9.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Enpro Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (7.1% CAGR vs -9.6%).
Forestar Group Inc. is a residential lot development company based in Arlington, Texas. The company has operations in 51 markets in 21 states and delivered 11,518 residential lots during the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2020. The company is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange and in October 2017 became a majority-owned subsidiary of D.R. Horton, Inc., the largest homebuilder by volume in the United States since 2002. The company primarily acquires entitled real estate and...
Enpro is a US-based industrial technology company that designs and manufactures products and materials for technology-intensive sectors. The company serves industries such as semiconductors, aerospace, power generation, heavy-duty trucking, agricultural machinery, chemical processing, pulp and paper, and life sciences from 61 primary manufacturing facilities located in 12 countries, worldwide. It is organized under three segments: Sealing Technologies, Advanced Surface Technologies, and Engin...
FOR vs NPO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $273.0M | $295.4M |
| Net Profit | $15.4M | $-32.0M |
| Gross Margin | 20.1% | 42.1% |
| Operating Margin | 7.6% | 11.2% |
| Net Margin | 5.6% | -10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.0% | 14.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -6.7% | -330.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.30 | $-1.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $273.0M | $295.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $670.5M | $286.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $390.5M | $288.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $351.0M | $273.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $250.4M | $258.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $551.3M | $260.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $318.4M | $271.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $333.8M | $257.5M |
| Q4 25 | $15.4M | $-32.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.9M | $21.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.9M | $26.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.6M | $24.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.5M | $13.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $81.5M | $19.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.7M | $26.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.0M | $12.5M |
| Q4 25 | 20.1% | 42.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.3% | 41.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | 43.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.6% | 43.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.0% | 42.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.9% | 42.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.5% | 43.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.9% | 41.2% |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.9% | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.6% | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.7% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.2% | 17.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.6% | 10.9% |
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | -10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.0% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.6% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.8% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.2% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.5% | 4.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.30 | $-1.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.70 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.65 | $1.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.62 | $1.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.32 | $0.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.59 | $0.94 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.76 | $1.27 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.89 | $0.59 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $211.7M | $114.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $793.2M | $655.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.8B | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $2.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.44× | 0.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $211.7M | $114.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $379.2M | $132.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $189.2M | $107.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $174.3M | $240.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $132.0M | $236.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $481.2M | $206.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $359.2M | $175.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $416.2M | $163.9M |
| Q4 25 | $793.2M | $655.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $802.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $872.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $872.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $806.8M | $640.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $706.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $706.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $705.7M | $644.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | 0.44× | 0.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.52× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.50× | 0.45× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.48× | 0.46× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-157.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-157.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -57.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 4.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -10.19× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $93.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-157.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $256.3M | $65.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.8M | $52.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-19.8M | $21.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-450.0M | $59.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.2M | $54.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-61.7M | $43.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-59.2M | $6.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-157.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.6M | $53.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.0M | $42.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.5M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $49.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $118.4M | $48.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-62.3M | $38.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-59.8M | $-1.9M |
| Q4 25 | -57.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.1% | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 14.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.8% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.5% | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -19.6% | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -17.9% | -0.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | -10.19× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | 3.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.48× | 1.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.63× | 0.86× | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.27× | 4.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.46× | 2.73× | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.59× | 1.62× | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.32× | 0.50× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FOR
| D.R.Horton Inc. | $183.8M | 67% |
| Other | $89.2M | 33% |
NPO
| Sealing Technologies Segment | $187.0M | 63% |
| General Industrial | $71.3M | 24% |
| Power Generation | $19.9M | 7% |
| Oiland Gas Market | $15.0M | 5% |
| Semiconductors | $2.2M | 1% |
