vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FOX FACTORY HOLDING CORP (FOXF) and SM Energy Co (SM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SM Energy Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($704.9M vs $376.4M, roughly 1.9× FOX FACTORY HOLDING CORP). On growth, FOX FACTORY HOLDING CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.8% vs -17.3%). Over the past eight quarters, SM Energy Co's revenue compounded faster (12.2% CAGR vs 6.4%).
Fox Factory Holding Corp. is an American company best known for their Fox Racing Shox brand of off-road racing suspension components.
SM Energy Company is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Denver, Colorado.
FOXF vs SM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $376.4M | $704.9M |
| Net Profit | $-634.0K | — |
| Gross Margin | 30.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | 25.9% |
| Net Margin | -0.2% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 4.8% | -17.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -113.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | $0.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $376.4M | $704.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.9M | $811.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $355.0M | $792.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $352.8M | $844.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $852.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $359.1M | $643.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $348.5M | $634.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $333.5M | $559.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-634.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7M | $155.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-259.7M | $201.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-141.0K | $182.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8M | $240.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4M | $210.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.5M | $131.2M |
| Q4 25 | 30.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -70.6% | 37.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 51.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 44.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.7% | 31.9% |
| Q4 25 | -0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -73.1% | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.0% | 21.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | 37.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 33.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.0% | 23.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.02 | $0.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.07 | $1.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.23 | $1.76 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $1.59 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.63 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.11 | $2.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.13 | $1.82 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $1.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $368.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $536.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $956.0M | $4.8B |
| Total Assets | $2.0B | $9.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.56× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $368.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $162.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $101.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.7M | $54.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $487.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $506.3M |
| Q4 25 | $536.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $541.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $546.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $552.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $558.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $564.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $370.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $956.0M | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $958.7M | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $939.9M | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $3.7B |
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $9.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $9.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $8.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $6.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $6.4B |
| Q4 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.3M | $451.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $85.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.3M | $451.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.8M | $505.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $680.0K | $571.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.7M | $483.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $578.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.1M | $452.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.7M | $476.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.4M | $276.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-555.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.41× | 3.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.94× | 1.88× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.94× | 2.27× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FOXF
| Specialty Sports Group | $132.7M | 35% |
| Powered Vehicles Group | $125.9M | 33% |
| Aftermarket Applications Group | $117.8M | 31% |
SM
Segment breakdown not available.
