vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of JFrog Ltd (FROG) and TRICO BANCSHARES (TCBK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
JFrog Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($145.3M vs $109.4M, roughly 1.3× TRICO BANCSHARES ). TRICO BANCSHARES runs the higher net margin — 251.6% vs -10.5%, a 262.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, JFrog Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.2% vs 9.0%). TRICO BANCSHARES produced more free cash flow last quarter ($127.9M vs $49.9M). Over the past eight quarters, JFrog Ltd's revenue compounded faster (20.4% CAGR vs 5.4%).
JFrog Ltd is a global DevOps technology provider that delivers end-to-end software release, artifact management, and security solutions. It serves clients across tech, finance, retail, and manufacturing sectors, helping teams streamline development and delivery workflows for cloud, on-premises, and hybrid infrastructure.
Trico Bancshares is a U.S.-headquartered regional bank holding company operating Tri Counties Bank. It offers a full range of retail and commercial banking services including deposit products, mortgages, small business loans, and wealth management, primarily serving consumers and SMEs in Northern California.
FROG vs TCBK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $145.3M | $109.4M |
| Net Profit | $-15.2M | $33.6M |
| Gross Margin | 77.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -14.7% | 42.6% |
| Net Margin | -10.5% | 251.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 25.2% | 9.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 34.4% | 15.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.13 | $1.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $145.3M | $109.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $136.9M | $107.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $127.2M | $103.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $122.4M | $98.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.1M | $100.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $109.1M | $99.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $103.0M | $97.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $100.3M | $98.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-15.2M | $33.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-16.4M | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-21.7M | $27.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-18.5M | $26.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-23.2M | $29.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.9M | $29.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.3M | $29.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.8M | $27.7M |
| Q4 25 | 77.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 77.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 76.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 75.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 75.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 78.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 79.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | -14.7% | 42.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -15.8% | 43.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.4% | 36.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -18.8% | 35.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -21.9% | 38.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -27.4% | 39.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.6% | 40.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -16.6% | 38.3% |
| Q4 25 | -10.5% | 251.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.0% | 31.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.0% | 26.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -15.1% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.0% | 221.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -21.0% | 29.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.9% | 29.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.8% | 28.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.13 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.14 | $1.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.19 | $0.84 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.16 | $0.80 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.21 | $0.88 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.21 | $0.88 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.13 | $0.87 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $0.83 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $704.4M | $157.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $887.4M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $704.4M | $157.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $651.1M | $298.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $611.7M | $314.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $563.5M | $308.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $522.0M | $145.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $467.8M | $320.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $591.3M | $206.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $579.6M | $82.8M |
| Q4 25 | $887.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $859.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $826.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $800.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $773.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $756.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $721.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $707.8M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $9.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $997.1M | $9.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $50.7M | $133.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $49.9M | $127.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 34.3% | 116.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 4.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.96× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $142.3M | $222.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $50.7M | $133.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.2M | $45.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.1M | $29.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.8M | $24.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.1M | $109.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.6M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.7M | $31.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.5M | $25.1M |
| Q4 25 | $49.9M | $127.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.8M | $43.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.5M | $28.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.1M | $22.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $48.5M | $105.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.7M | $27.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0M | $30.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.6M | $24.1M |
| Q4 25 | 34.3% | 116.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.0% | 40.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.9% | 27.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.0% | 23.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.8% | 104.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.5% | 27.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.5% | 31.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.6% | 24.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.96× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.90× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
