vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Primis Financial Corp. (FRST) and KAMADA LTD (KMDA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KAMADA LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($47.0M vs $45.6M, roughly 1.0× Primis Financial Corp.). Primis Financial Corp. runs the higher net margin — 16.0% vs 11.3%, a 4.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, Primis Financial Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (13.0% CAGR vs 12.0%).
Primis Financial Corp is a U.S.-based financial holding company operating full-service banking subsidiaries. It provides a comprehensive range of financial solutions including personal and commercial deposit products, diverse loan facilities, mortgage services, and wealth management support, primarily serving retail and corporate customers across the U.S. mid-Atlantic region.
Kamada Ltd. is a global biopharmaceutical company specializing in the research, manufacturing, and commercialization of specialty pharmaceuticals derived from human plasma.
FRST vs KMDA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $45.6M | $47.0M |
| Net Profit | $7.3M | $5.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 42.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 16.6% |
| Net Margin | 16.0% | 11.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 12.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 200.0% | 37.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.30 | $0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $45.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $80.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.0M | $47.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.2M | $44.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.7M | $44.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.3M | $41.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.7M | $42.5M |
| Q1 26 | $7.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $29.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.8M | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4M | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.6M | $4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-26.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2M | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $4.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 42.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 47.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 44.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 44.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.3% | 16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 15.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.9% | 17.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -123.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.1% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | 13.3% |
| Q1 26 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 36.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.7% | 11.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.6% | 16.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.6% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -100.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.6% | 10.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.30 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.19 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.28 | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.92 | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.95 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.05 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.14 | $0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $159.9M | $72.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $427.2M | $265.2M |
| Total Assets | $4.3B | $377.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $159.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $143.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.9M | $72.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.1M | $66.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.0M | $76.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.3M | $72.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.6M | $56.5M |
| Q1 26 | $427.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $422.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $382.2M | $265.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $376.4M | $260.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $375.6M | $252.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $351.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $381.0M | $255.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $376.0M | $251.2M |
| Q1 26 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $377.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9B | $368.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | $375.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $351.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $351.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $10.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.97× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.4M | $10.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-41.0M | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.4M | $-513.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.1M | $22.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.3M | $14.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 47.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.67× | 1.97× | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.82× | 1.09× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.52× | -0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.93× | 5.75× | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.21× | 3.15× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FRST
| Net Interest Income | $32.1M | 70% |
| Noninterest Income | $13.6M | 30% |
KMDA
Segment breakdown not available.