vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Primis Financial Corp. (FRST) and Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Nano Dimension Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($57.8M vs $45.6M, roughly 1.3× Primis Financial Corp.). Primis Financial Corp. runs the higher net margin — 16.0% vs -171.1%, a 187.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Primis Financial Corp is a U.S.-based financial holding company operating full-service banking subsidiaries. It provides a comprehensive range of financial solutions including personal and commercial deposit products, diverse loan facilities, mortgage services, and wealth management support, primarily serving retail and corporate customers across the U.S. mid-Atlantic region.
Nano Dimension Ltd. is a leading provider of additively manufactured electronics solutions and 3D printing technologies. It designs high-precision 3D printers, related materials, and software for producing printed circuit boards, microelectronics components, and multi-layer electronic devices, serving aerospace, defense, medical, automotive, and industrial electronics segments across global markets.
FRST vs NNDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $45.6M | $57.8M |
| Net Profit | $7.3M | $-98.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 43.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -155.1% |
| Net Margin | 16.0% | -171.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 200.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.30 | $-0.45 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $45.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $80.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.8M | $57.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.7M | $28.4M |
| Q1 26 | $7.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $29.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-26.2M | $-98.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $-79.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 44.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -123.0% | -155.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 36.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -100.3% | -171.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.6% | -279.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.30 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.19 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.28 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.92 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.95 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.14 | $-0.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $159.9M | $317.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $427.2M | $860.0M |
| Total Assets | $4.3B | $902.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $159.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $143.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.5M | $317.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.6M | $231.8M |
| Q1 26 | $427.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $422.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $382.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $376.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $375.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $351.8M | $860.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $381.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $376.0M | $870.3M |
| Q1 26 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $902.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $911.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-18.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-21.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -36.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-41.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.5M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.3M | $-30.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.3M | $-21.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 47.3% | -36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.1% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.67× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.82× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.52× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.93× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.21× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FRST
| Net Interest Income | $32.1M | 70% |
| Noninterest Income | $13.6M | 30% |
NNDM
Segment breakdown not available.
