vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and LendingClub Corp (LC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Federal Realty Investment Trust is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($336.0M vs $252.3M, roughly 1.3× LendingClub Corp). Federal Realty Investment Trust runs the higher net margin — 38.6% vs 20.5%, a 18.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LendingClub Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs 8.7%). Over the past eight quarters, LendingClub Corp's revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs 6.5%).

Federal Realty Investment Trust is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers in the Northeastern United States, the Mid-Atlantic states, California, and South Florida.

LendingClub Corporation is an American financial services company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It was the first peer-to-peer lender to register its offerings as securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and to offer loan trading on a secondary market. At its height, LendingClub was the world's largest peer-to-peer lending platform. The company reported that $15.98 billion in loans had been originated through its platform up to December 31, 2015.

FRT vs LC — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
FRT
FRT
1.3× larger
FRT
$336.0M
$252.3M
LC
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
LC
LC
+7.2% gap
LC
15.9%
8.7%
FRT
Higher net margin
FRT
FRT
18.2% more per $
FRT
38.6%
20.5%
LC
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
LC
LC
Annualised
LC
16.1%
6.5%
FRT

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
FRT
FRT
LC
LC
Revenue
$336.0M
$252.3M
Net Profit
$129.7M
$51.6M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
53.8%
Net Margin
38.6%
20.5%
Revenue YoY
8.7%
15.9%
Net Profit YoY
103.5%
341.0%
EPS (diluted)
$1.49
$0.44

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FRT
FRT
LC
LC
Q1 26
$336.0M
$252.3M
Q4 25
$336.0M
$266.5M
Q3 25
$322.3M
$266.2M
Q2 25
$311.5M
$248.4M
Q1 25
$309.2M
$217.7M
Q4 24
$311.4M
$217.2M
Q3 24
$303.6M
$201.9M
Q2 24
$296.1M
$187.2M
Net Profit
FRT
FRT
LC
LC
Q1 26
$129.7M
$51.6M
Q4 25
$129.7M
Q3 25
$61.6M
$44.3M
Q2 25
$155.9M
$38.2M
Q1 25
$63.8M
$11.7M
Q4 24
$65.5M
Q3 24
$61.0M
$14.5M
Q2 24
$112.0M
$14.9M
Operating Margin
FRT
FRT
LC
LC
Q1 26
53.8%
Q4 25
53.8%
18.8%
Q3 25
34.3%
21.5%
Q2 25
65.1%
21.7%
Q1 25
35.0%
7.2%
Q4 24
35.1%
5.1%
Q3 24
34.9%
8.9%
Q2 24
53.0%
10.4%
Net Margin
FRT
FRT
LC
LC
Q1 26
38.6%
20.5%
Q4 25
38.6%
Q3 25
19.1%
16.6%
Q2 25
50.0%
15.4%
Q1 25
20.6%
5.4%
Q4 24
21.0%
Q3 24
20.1%
7.2%
Q2 24
37.8%
8.0%
EPS (diluted)
FRT
FRT
LC
LC
Q1 26
$1.49
$0.44
Q4 25
$1.49
$0.36
Q3 25
$0.69
$0.37
Q2 25
$1.78
$0.33
Q1 25
$0.72
$0.10
Q4 24
$0.74
$0.08
Q3 24
$0.70
$0.13
Q2 24
$1.32
$0.13

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FRT
FRT
LC
LC
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$107.4M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$5.0B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$3.2B
$1.5B
Total Assets
$9.1B
$11.9B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.53×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FRT
FRT
LC
LC
Q1 26
$107.4M
Q4 25
$107.4M
Q3 25
$111.3M
Q2 25
$177.0M
Q1 25
$109.2M
Q4 24
$123.4M
Q3 24
$97.0M
Q2 24
$103.2M
Total Debt
FRT
FRT
LC
LC
Q1 26
$5.0B
Q4 25
$5.0B
$0
Q3 25
$0
Q2 25
$0
Q1 25
$0
Q4 24
$4.5B
$0
Q3 24
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
FRT
FRT
LC
LC
Q1 26
$3.2B
$1.5B
Q4 25
$3.2B
$1.5B
Q3 25
$3.2B
$1.5B
Q2 25
$3.2B
$1.4B
Q1 25
$3.2B
$1.4B
Q4 24
$3.2B
$1.3B
Q3 24
$3.1B
$1.3B
Q2 24
$3.0B
$1.3B
Total Assets
FRT
FRT
LC
LC
Q1 26
$9.1B
$11.9B
Q4 25
$9.1B
$11.6B
Q3 25
$8.9B
$11.1B
Q2 25
$8.6B
$10.8B
Q1 25
$8.6B
$10.5B
Q4 24
$8.5B
$10.6B
Q3 24
$8.5B
$11.0B
Q2 24
$8.4B
$9.6B
Debt / Equity
FRT
FRT
LC
LC
Q1 26
1.53×
Q4 25
1.53×
0.00×
Q3 25
0.00×
Q2 25
0.00×
Q1 25
0.00×
Q4 24
1.42×
0.00×
Q3 24
Q2 24

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons