vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and OFG BANCORP (OFG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Federal Realty Investment Trust is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($336.0M vs $184.3M, roughly 1.8× OFG BANCORP). Federal Realty Investment Trust runs the higher net margin — 38.6% vs 30.3%, a 8.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Federal Realty Investment Trust posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.7% vs 0.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Federal Realty Investment Trust's revenue compounded faster (6.5% CAGR vs 2.8%).
Federal Realty Investment Trust is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers in the Northeastern United States, the Mid-Atlantic states, California, and South Florida.
OFG Bancorp, founded in 1964, is the financial holding company for Oriental Bank, located in San Juan, Puerto Rico. OFG offers a wide range of retail and commercial banking, lending and wealth management products, services and technology, primarily in Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands through its principal subsidiaries: Oriental Bank, Oriental Financial Services LLC, and Oriental Insurance LLC. Its headquarters are located at Oriental Center, 254 Muñoz Rivera Avenue, San Juan, PR 00918....
FRT vs OFG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $336.0M | $184.3M |
| Net Profit | $129.7M | $55.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 53.8% | 25.7% |
| Net Margin | 38.6% | 30.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.7% | 0.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 103.5% | 11.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.49 | $1.27 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $336.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $336.0M | $184.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $322.3M | $186.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.5M | $182.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $309.2M | $178.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $311.4M | $182.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $303.6M | $174.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $296.1M | $179.8M |
| Q1 26 | $129.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $129.7M | $55.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.6M | $51.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $155.9M | $51.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.8M | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.5M | $50.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.0M | $47.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $112.0M | $51.1M |
| Q1 26 | 53.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.8% | 25.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.3% | 33.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.1% | 36.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.0% | 33.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.1% | 28.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.9% | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 53.0% | 39.6% |
| Q1 26 | 38.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.6% | 30.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.1% | 27.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.0% | 28.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.6% | 25.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | 27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.1% | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.8% | 28.4% |
| Q1 26 | $1.49 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.49 | $1.27 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.69 | $1.16 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.78 | $1.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.72 | $1.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.74 | $1.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.70 | $1.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.32 | $1.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $107.4M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.0B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.2B | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $9.1B | $12.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.53× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $107.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $107.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $111.3M | $740.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.0M | $851.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $109.2M | $710.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $123.4M | $591.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $97.0M | $680.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $103.2M | $740.4M |
| Q1 26 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $9.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.1B | $12.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9B | $12.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.6B | $12.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.6B | $11.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5B | $11.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5B | $11.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.4B | $11.3B |
| Q1 26 | 1.53× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.53× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.42× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $217.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $199.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 108.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 10.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.90× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $345.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $622.4M | $217.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $147.8M | $39.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $150.7M | $35.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $179.0M | $83.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $574.6M | $252.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $144.1M | $58.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $169.7M | $95.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $199.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $35.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $31.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $78.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $231.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $51.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $90.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 108.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 44.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 126.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 50.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.80× | 3.90× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.40× | 0.76× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.97× | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.81× | 1.82× | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.77× | 5.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.36× | 1.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.52× | 1.86× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
