vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC (PLOW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Federal Realty Investment Trust is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($336.0M vs $184.5M, roughly 1.8× DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC). Federal Realty Investment Trust runs the higher net margin — 38.6% vs 7.0%, a 31.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.6% vs 8.7%). Over the past eight quarters, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC's revenue compounded faster (38.9% CAGR vs 6.5%).
Federal Realty Investment Trust is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers in the Northeastern United States, the Mid-Atlantic states, California, and South Florida.
General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is an American industrial and technology company based in Reston, Virginia. It is primarily a developer and producer of advanced military equipment of a wide variety, such as nuclear submarines, main battle tanks, and armoured fighting vehicles. It is also the manufacturer of the civilian aviation Gulfstream business jets and a provider of information technology services. The company is the 3rd largest of the top 100 contractors of the U.S. federal government...
FRT vs PLOW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $336.0M | $184.5M |
| Net Profit | $129.7M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | 53.8% | 10.5% |
| Net Margin | 38.6% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.7% | 28.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 103.5% | 62.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.49 | $0.54 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $336.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $336.0M | $184.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $322.3M | $162.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.5M | $194.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $309.2M | $115.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $311.4M | $143.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $303.6M | $129.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $296.1M | $199.9M |
| Q1 26 | $129.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $129.7M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.6M | $8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $155.9M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.8M | $148.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.5M | $7.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.0M | $32.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $112.0M | $24.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.7% |
| Q1 26 | 53.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.8% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.3% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.1% | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.0% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.1% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.9% | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 53.0% | 18.2% |
| Q1 26 | 38.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.6% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.1% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.0% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.1% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.8% | 12.2% |
| Q1 26 | $1.49 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.49 | $0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.69 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.78 | $1.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.72 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.74 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.70 | $1.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.32 | $1.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $107.4M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.0B | $144.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.2B | $281.4M |
| Total Assets | $9.1B | $626.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.53× | 0.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $107.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $107.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $111.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $109.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $123.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $97.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $103.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.0B | $144.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $147.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $275.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $273.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $258.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $264.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $260.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $236.7M |
| Q1 26 | $9.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.1B | $626.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9B | $694.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.6B | $671.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.6B | $621.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5B | $590.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5B | $665.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.4B | $617.0M |
| Q1 26 | 1.53× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.53× | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.42× | 0.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $95.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $92.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 50.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 7.47× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $63.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $622.4M | $95.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $147.8M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $150.7M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $179.0M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $574.6M | $74.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $144.1M | $-14.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $169.7M | $2.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $92.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-14.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $70.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-15.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $836.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 50.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.80× | 7.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.40× | -1.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.97× | -0.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.81× | -9.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.77× | 9.41× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.36× | -0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.52× | 0.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FRT
Segment breakdown not available.
PLOW
| Work Truck Solutions | $101.5M | 55% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $83.1M | 45% |
