vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and Ralliant Corp (RAL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ralliant Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($529.1M vs $336.0M, roughly 1.6× Federal Realty Investment Trust). Federal Realty Investment Trust runs the higher net margin — 38.6% vs 7.5%, a 31.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Federal Realty Investment Trust posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.7% vs -0.5%).
Federal Realty Investment Trust is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers in the Northeastern United States, the Mid-Atlantic states, California, and South Florida.
FRT vs RAL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $336.0M | $529.1M |
| Net Profit | $129.7M | $39.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 50.8% |
| Operating Margin | 53.8% | 9.8% |
| Net Margin | 38.6% | 7.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.7% | -0.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 103.5% | -56.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.49 | $0.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $336.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $336.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $322.3M | $529.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.5M | $503.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $309.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $311.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $303.6M | $531.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $296.1M | $533.7M |
| Q1 26 | $129.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $129.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.6M | $39.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $155.9M | $47.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.0M | $90.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $112.0M | $64.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 49.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 52.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 51.5% |
| Q1 26 | 53.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.3% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.1% | 11.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.9% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 53.0% | 19.7% |
| Q1 26 | 38.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.1% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.0% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.1% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.8% | 12.1% |
| Q1 26 | $1.49 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.49 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.69 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.78 | $0.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.72 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.74 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.70 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.32 | $0.57 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $107.4M | $264.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.0B | $1.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.2B | $3.0B |
| Total Assets | $9.1B | $5.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.53× | 0.39× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $107.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $107.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $111.3M | $264.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.0M | $198.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $109.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $123.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $97.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $103.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $4.0B |
| Q1 26 | $9.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.6B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.4B | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.53× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.53× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.39× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.38× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.42× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $138.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $126.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 23.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.47× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $622.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $147.8M | $138.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $150.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $179.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $574.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $144.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $169.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $126.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.80× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.40× | 3.47× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.97× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.81× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.77× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.36× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.52× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FRT
Segment breakdown not available.
RAL
| Industrial Manufacturing | $111.1M | 21% |
| Defense And Space | $93.6M | 18% |
| Diversified Electronics | $91.0M | 17% |
| Test And Measurement | $76.8M | 15% |
| Communications | $60.7M | 11% |
| Semiconductors | $51.4M | 10% |
| Other Direct End Markets | $44.4M | 8% |
